Tucker Carlson

Now you would think that that would be not allowed, double jeopardy, while the feds made the case, well those were state charges, these were federal charges, but he had a federal non-prosecution agreement. It's not a defense of Jeffrey Epstein, of course. It's merely noting the obvious, which is what the Justice Department did to Jeffrey Epstein in 2019 was very weird. And no one has ever explained why they did that, but what we do know is that a month and three days after he was arrested at Teterboro airport, he was dead.

And he was murdered. That's obvious. And it was never investigated. That's a fact. So what does that add up to? Well, I don't know. Draw your own conclusions. Here you have a guy who's entangled with multiple intel agencies from a bunch of different countries, notably the United States and Israel, but also British intelligence, probably the French, the usual panoply.

And he's running around the world as an arms dealer and a connector. And he's got some relationship to 9-11. What is that? He wins Powerball. He's operating at the highest levels. He's not running anything, but he's operating at those levels. And he knows a lot. A lot, a lot. And one day he is summoned back from Paris and arrested. And a month later he's murdered. So it stands to reason that anyone involved in any of that probably had direct involvement in his murder.

No one ever asked these questions. That's not considered interesting because it's not related to sex. But it may be a little bit closer to the heart of why this is such a touchy subject for this administration. Because keep in mind, Donald Trump was president in 2019. And it was his attorney general, Attorney General Barr, the son, strangely, of the man who had given Jeffrey Epstein his first job teaching at the Dalton School and then helped get him a job at Bear Stearns. And then launched him into whatever world he occupied until he was murdered.

under the authority of Attorney General Barr. Kind of weird. Well, so weird that at very least it demands an explanation, which we've never received. In any case, probably not going to receive one anytime soon, because the president who could explain it was remarkably touchy about the subject. Very, very touchy.

And whenever it came up, and this was a shock to a lot of his supporters, he didn't just brush it off and say, oh yeah, we'll get to that after we fix the economy and lowered gas prices and made it possible for your son to get a job. No, his response was, well, hysterical. Shut up! Anyone who asks about Epstein is not my supporter and I don't want your support. He said that in a Truth Social post at the time, last summer. Look it up.

And so for those of us who campaigned for Trump and voted for him and liked him, the first thought was, what is this? Isn't the whole point of your administration to drain the swamp? Isn't this why you got elected? So you could end this two-tiered system where some people get to molest kids and win Powerball in Oklahoma and everything's fine until they're murdered somehow, but no one could ever figure out how. And the rest of us who get arrested for having three beers and driving to 7-Eleven.

You get arrested because you make a mistake on your tax form. Not all of us have Department of Justice ordered respite from federal audits. Some of us are subject to federal audits and know that we'll get them if we step out of line. So it would be nice, and again, this was the promise of the campaign and of the administration and the reason that some of us filed into church.

though behind Miriam Adelson, on that cold morning a year and a half ago. Why would Donald Trump shut down any, not just investigation into, but any conversation about the guy who embodies the corruption he was elected to end? That thought has never left my mind and probably the mind of a lot of other people. Was Trump involved in some weird sex thing? Probably not, actually. That might be better than the actual answer.

Ja todellinen vastaus voi olla, että Donald Trump käsittelee juuri niitä ihmisiä, joita hän oli valinnut käsittelemään. Joten se oli se hetki. No, huomattavasti Thomas Massey ei saanut memoa, mutta se on täysin lähellä. Puhutaan mitä tahansa haluat. Voit hauskaa Kamala Harrisin kivistä, mutta et puhu Epsteinistä, koska koko pointti republikaan partista on varmistaa, että emme puhu Epsteinistä. Eikö se ole oikein? Eikö se ole se, että hän tuli republikaan?

Thomas Massey ei saanut memoa, ja hän alkoi sanoa autistisesta perinteisestä tapauksesta, että mitä Epsteiniltä on? Haluan tietää Epsteiniltä! Ja sen sijaan, että hänet jätetään pois tai jätetään pois tai huomioidaan hänet, Donald Trump pysähtyi häneltä. Ja alkoi haittaa Thomasa Masseyltä. Ja seuraavassa tapauksessa, joka voi osoittaa, mitä Epsteinin tarina on oikeastaan, hän teki yksinkertaisen taustan joidenkin suurimmilta hyökkäilijöiltä. Niitä olisi Paul Singer. Paul Singer!

a liberal who is somehow one of the biggest donors in the Republican Party, John Paulson, and of course Miriam Adelson. And they colluded in effect to destroy Thomas Massey. Now, Thomas Massey, in addition to calling for more disclosure of the Epstein documents, which by the way belong to the citizens of the United States, they aren't the personal property of any federal bureaucrat, they belong to the people of the country.

who also, by the way, own the federal detention center in which Epstein was murdered, and are therefore owed an explanation of who murdered him and why, and why hasn't that person been arrested. In any case, Thomas Massey demanded this. But Thomas Massey also had another distinction, another asterisk by his name. Out of 217 Republicans in the Congress, Thomas Massey is the only one who's never taken money from the Israeli lobby. He's the only one.

Thomas Massey ei ole koskaan kuitenkaan koskaan vastaanottanut Israelia. Voit tutkia arkkia, että Thomas Massey vaikuttaa Israelille tai juutalaisille tai muuhun aiheeseen. Se ei kuitenkaan ole niin kiinnostavaa. Thomas Masseyn positiivisuus on yksityinen ja jatkuva jatkuvasti. Yhdysvalloissa on paljon ongelmia. Ehkä ensimmäisenä niistä on liiketoimintaa. Yhdysvalloissa on rikkoja. Yhdessä rikkoja. Yhdysvalloissa on niin rikkoja liiketoimintaan, että kreditoinnissa on huolta.

and we cannot afford to send any more foreign aid to anyone. That would include Egypt, and it would very much include the largest recipient of foreign aid by far, which is Israel, which is not strategically important to the United States in any sense. We receive nothing of value from Israel, nothing. And when you compare whatever tech we receive, the spyware on our phones,

Against the cost in dead Americans and in American dollars and in the total isolation now of the United States, which is in part the result of our alliance with Israel, it's not a good deal for us. And so Thomas Messias stood alone all of these years. He's made zero headway in stopping aid to Israel or in even changing minds about Israel. But he has persisted in his lonely principled campaign against foreign aid.

And so because of that, Trump colluded with three of his donors, including his biggest, Mary Madelson, to destroy Thomas Massey and to end his career in Congress by beating him in the Republican primary in the 4th District of Kentucky, a place we can bet Mary Madelson has never been to and could not find on a map and in which she has no real interest.

Ja se vaikuttaa kysymykseen, miksi hän ja hänen ystäviensä neokaniljaiset pysyvät kymmeniä miljoonia dollaria, jotta Thomas Massey jätäisi kongressia. Ja tietenkin, koska Israelin. Se on se. Thomas Massey kritisoi, ei Israelin, mutta Amerikkan yhteistyötä Israelin kanssa. Ja se ei voi olla mahdollista. Se, mikä on mielenkiintoista, on se, että se ei ollut vain Trumpin. Ja se ei ollut vain hänen donoreistaan, Mary Madelsonin ja Paul Singerin ja Paulsonin ja muiden.

It was the entire American news media, left and right. Here's CBS News interviewing Thomas Massey about his race in really one of the remarkable clips of the past month. Watch this. There have been more than 32 million dollars spent on a primary in this congressional district, which is now the most expensive House primary ever in the United States.

You got to wonder what that kid from CBS News is being paid, and does he ask himself, is it worth it? So he of course asked the question to Massey, which is not a question, it's slander, posing as a question, are you an antisemite? There's no evidence Massey's an antisemite. He's never said anything, not one thing, antisemitic, ever, because he's not an antisemite.