Tulsi Gabbard

And if a social media platform has at least 20% ownership in a social media platform, that platform may be banned from doing business in America, essentially. But it's not just a foreign state actor that could be named as a foreign adversary. It also includes a line in the legislation that if... Let's say a person has at least 25% financial interest or ownership in a social media platform.

And if a social media platform has at least 20% ownership in a social media platform, that platform may be banned from doing business in America, essentially. But it's not just a foreign state actor that could be named as a foreign adversary. It also includes a line in the legislation that if... Let's say a person has at least 25% financial interest or ownership in a social media platform.

And if a social media platform has at least 20% ownership in a social media platform, that platform may be banned from doing business in America, essentially. But it's not just a foreign state actor that could be named as a foreign adversary. It also includes a line in the legislation that if... Let's say a person has at least 25% financial interest or ownership in a social media platform.

They're an American citizen who may be working or living in some other country. Or working or living here, but doing business with other countries. If the executive branch of our government decides that this individual is under the influence of or controlled by... someone that they deem a foreign adversary, then that platform must not do business in America.

They're an American citizen who may be working or living in some other country. Or working or living here, but doing business with other countries. If the executive branch of our government decides that this individual is under the influence of or controlled by... someone that they deem a foreign adversary, then that platform must not do business in America.

They're an American citizen who may be working or living in some other country. Or working or living here, but doing business with other countries. If the executive branch of our government decides that this individual is under the influence of or controlled by... someone that they deem a foreign adversary, then that platform must not do business in America.

And that person, obviously, even an American citizen, is banned from conducting that business. They must divest, essentially. So when you look at, and this is where there's been a lot of chatter around this, when you look at Elon Musk, for example, well, you already have people in the Biden administration, even President Biden himself, implying that Elon Musk's activities need to be investigated.

And that person, obviously, even an American citizen, is banned from conducting that business. They must divest, essentially. So when you look at, and this is where there's been a lot of chatter around this, when you look at Elon Musk, for example, well, you already have people in the Biden administration, even President Biden himself, implying that Elon Musk's activities need to be investigated.

And that person, obviously, even an American citizen, is banned from conducting that business. They must divest, essentially. So when you look at, and this is where there's been a lot of chatter around this, when you look at Elon Musk, for example, well, you already have people in the Biden administration, even President Biden himself, implying that Elon Musk's activities need to be investigated.

Well, he is someone with Tesla who does business in a lot of countries, including China, and therefore he must be investigated.

Well, he is someone with Tesla who does business in a lot of countries, including China, and therefore he must be investigated.

Well, he is someone with Tesla who does business in a lot of countries, including China, and therefore he must be investigated.

It is not at all a stretch of imagination to say that X could be the next platform that the executive branch decides, nope, we've designated this person to be a foreign adversary and therefore his business interest cannot be allowed for the social media platform, cannot be allowed. to exist. We've seen this already with people accusing him and X of interfering in our elections.

It is not at all a stretch of imagination to say that X could be the next platform that the executive branch decides, nope, we've designated this person to be a foreign adversary and therefore his business interest cannot be allowed for the social media platform, cannot be allowed. to exist. We've seen this already with people accusing him and X of interfering in our elections.

It is not at all a stretch of imagination to say that X could be the next platform that the executive branch decides, nope, we've designated this person to be a foreign adversary and therefore his business interest cannot be allowed for the social media platform, cannot be allowed. to exist. We've seen this already with people accusing him and X of interfering in our elections.

Again, it's ironic that it's coming from the Democratic Party that they are claiming that A guy who has said himself he's committed to free speech and is allowing free speech on his platform and is not allowing the federal government to manipulate his platform by deeming which accounts are okay to, you know...

Again, it's ironic that it's coming from the Democratic Party that they are claiming that A guy who has said himself he's committed to free speech and is allowing free speech on his platform and is not allowing the federal government to manipulate his platform by deeming which accounts are okay to, you know...

Again, it's ironic that it's coming from the Democratic Party that they are claiming that A guy who has said himself he's committed to free speech and is allowing free speech on his platform and is not allowing the federal government to manipulate his platform by deeming which accounts are okay to, you know...

posts their content and which accounts are not because of disinformation or whatever they claim it to be, it's not an accident that the social media platforms that have been proven to take action at the behest of the federal government and the White House to censor certain voices They're not included with or being targeted at all in this legislation or outside of it.

posts their content and which accounts are not because of disinformation or whatever they claim it to be, it's not an accident that the social media platforms that have been proven to take action at the behest of the federal government and the White House to censor certain voices They're not included with or being targeted at all in this legislation or outside of it.