Tulsi Gabbard

And he knows that that's what's in the best interest for the American people and for the world.

And he knows that that's what's in the best interest for the American people and for the world.

And he knows that that's what's in the best interest for the American people and for the world.

First of all, the military option is always on the table. The president often talks about peace through strength. And he means what he says when he talks about his objective, which is also Prime Minister Netanyahu's objective. And I think many countries in the world would agree that Iran cannot be in a position to have a nuclear weapon or to develop a nuclear weapon. That is unequivocal.

First of all, the military option is always on the table. The president often talks about peace through strength. And he means what he says when he talks about his objective, which is also Prime Minister Netanyahu's objective. And I think many countries in the world would agree that Iran cannot be in a position to have a nuclear weapon or to develop a nuclear weapon. That is unequivocal.

First of all, the military option is always on the table. The president often talks about peace through strength. And he means what he says when he talks about his objective, which is also Prime Minister Netanyahu's objective. And I think many countries in the world would agree that Iran cannot be in a position to have a nuclear weapon or to develop a nuclear weapon. That is unequivocal.

How we get there is really the question. The president is of the mind as he has been consistently through his first term in office as he is now. If there is a way to achieve what is in our best national security interests through peaceful means, through negotiations, not blind trust, like, okay, we're just going to believe whatever they say. Not at all.

How we get there is really the question. The president is of the mind as he has been consistently through his first term in office as he is now. If there is a way to achieve what is in our best national security interests through peaceful means, through negotiations, not blind trust, like, okay, we're just going to believe whatever they say. Not at all.

How we get there is really the question. The president is of the mind as he has been consistently through his first term in office as he is now. If there is a way to achieve what is in our best national security interests through peaceful means, through negotiations, not blind trust, like, okay, we're just going to believe whatever they say. Not at all.

Any deal that is potentially made with Iran will have to come with a very, very rigorous set of verification means. Nothing like the failure that was the JCPOA that President Obama negotiated. The deal that President Trump, through his very talented and exceptional ambassador in Steve Witkoff, is negotiating is a deal that will best serve the security interests of the American people.

Any deal that is potentially made with Iran will have to come with a very, very rigorous set of verification means. Nothing like the failure that was the JCPOA that President Obama negotiated. The deal that President Trump, through his very talented and exceptional ambassador in Steve Witkoff, is negotiating is a deal that will best serve the security interests of the American people.

Any deal that is potentially made with Iran will have to come with a very, very rigorous set of verification means. Nothing like the failure that was the JCPOA that President Obama negotiated. The deal that President Trump, through his very talented and exceptional ambassador in Steve Witkoff, is negotiating is a deal that will best serve the security interests of the American people.

Yeah, of course. The pressure's there. The debate is happening in the public, which I think is a good thing. It's a positive thing that we're hearing from different elements. Yes, even within the Republican Party. Even if they're leaking? I mean, because we're hearing from them that way. Well, the leaks should not... The leaks have to end. If the president can't have the confidence...

Yeah, of course. The pressure's there. The debate is happening in the public, which I think is a good thing. It's a positive thing that we're hearing from different elements. Yes, even within the Republican Party. Even if they're leaking? I mean, because we're hearing from them that way. Well, the leaks should not... The leaks have to end. If the president can't have the confidence...

Yeah, of course. The pressure's there. The debate is happening in the public, which I think is a good thing. It's a positive thing that we're hearing from different elements. Yes, even within the Republican Party. Even if they're leaking? I mean, because we're hearing from them that way. Well, the leaks should not... The leaks have to end. If the president can't have the confidence...

that he can sit in a room with his closest advisors without it leaking to the public, then that is something that really undermines his being best served with the best possible information, with debate, robust debate around the table, which you look at the team of people he's assembled, he likes that debate because he sees the value in hearing different perspectives so that he can make that best informed decision.

that he can sit in a room with his closest advisors without it leaking to the public, then that is something that really undermines his being best served with the best possible information, with debate, robust debate around the table, which you look at the team of people he's assembled, he likes that debate because he sees the value in hearing different perspectives so that he can make that best informed decision.

that he can sit in a room with his closest advisors without it leaking to the public, then that is something that really undermines his being best served with the best possible information, with debate, robust debate around the table, which you look at the team of people he's assembled, he likes that debate because he sees the value in hearing different perspectives so that he can make that best informed decision.

But when we look at this debate that's happening kind of in the public town square, whether it be digital or TV or whatever the platform is there, I think it's important for the American people to see the contrast and the difference between the neocons who are very ready to rush into war without allowing what President Kennedy spoke about in his historic speech at American University, which was to choose peace

But when we look at this debate that's happening kind of in the public town square, whether it be digital or TV or whatever the platform is there, I think it's important for the American people to see the contrast and the difference between the neocons who are very ready to rush into war without allowing what President Kennedy spoke about in his historic speech at American University, which was to choose peace