Tulsi Gabbard

There's a few things to add to that to kind of color out the picture. One of the most often tactics that these leakers use is they will take, let's say it's a six-page top secret classified document.

There's a few things to add to that to kind of color out the picture. One of the most often tactics that these leakers use is they will take, let's say it's a six-page top secret classified document.

There's a few things to add to that to kind of color out the picture. One of the most often tactics that these leakers use is they will take, let's say it's a six-page top secret classified document.

And they will pull a line from page one and a line from page two and a line from page three that when put together supports the narrative that they are trying to push but is not at all reflective of the kind of conclusive analysis in that report. And that's exactly what happened in this case.

And they will pull a line from page one and a line from page two and a line from page three that when put together supports the narrative that they are trying to push but is not at all reflective of the kind of conclusive analysis in that report. And that's exactly what happened in this case.

And they will pull a line from page one and a line from page two and a line from page three that when put together supports the narrative that they are trying to push but is not at all reflective of the kind of conclusive analysis in that report. And that's exactly what happened in this case.

So they very selectively and intentionally left out what was really the most important thing, which was that the FBI very clearly is the intelligence element that is responsible for domestic security. So it shouldn't be a surprise then that they are the element that said yes.

So they very selectively and intentionally left out what was really the most important thing, which was that the FBI very clearly is the intelligence element that is responsible for domestic security. So it shouldn't be a surprise then that they are the element that said yes.

So they very selectively and intentionally left out what was really the most important thing, which was that the FBI very clearly is the intelligence element that is responsible for domestic security. So it shouldn't be a surprise then that they are the element that said yes.

The Maduro Venezuelan government is supporting Trend de Aragua and their criminal activities here, enabled by President Biden's four years of open borders, where they very freely came in and out of our country and were able to begin to control territory here in the United States. The CIA doesn't collect intelligence here.

The Maduro Venezuelan government is supporting Trend de Aragua and their criminal activities here, enabled by President Biden's four years of open borders, where they very freely came in and out of our country and were able to begin to control territory here in the United States. The CIA doesn't collect intelligence here.

The Maduro Venezuelan government is supporting Trend de Aragua and their criminal activities here, enabled by President Biden's four years of open borders, where they very freely came in and out of our country and were able to begin to control territory here in the United States. The CIA doesn't collect intelligence here.

in the United States because that is not within their writ or their authorities. So again, this is why we look at the ways that intelligence leaks are politicized is by the selective picking and choosing and very clearly leaving out the thing that actually supports what the president is doing here.

in the United States because that is not within their writ or their authorities. So again, this is why we look at the ways that intelligence leaks are politicized is by the selective picking and choosing and very clearly leaving out the thing that actually supports what the president is doing here.

in the United States because that is not within their writ or their authorities. So again, this is why we look at the ways that intelligence leaks are politicized is by the selective picking and choosing and very clearly leaving out the thing that actually supports what the president is doing here.

What's your reaction? I mean, it's such a dangerous thing. And again, it's preposterous in my view that these judges, the judicial branch obviously plays an important role in our three co-equal branches of government, but they should understand what their role is. And these activist judges who now somehow believe that they're in the position of making policy,

What's your reaction? I mean, it's such a dangerous thing. And again, it's preposterous in my view that these judges, the judicial branch obviously plays an important role in our three co-equal branches of government, but they should understand what their role is. And these activist judges who now somehow believe that they're in the position of making policy,

What's your reaction? I mean, it's such a dangerous thing. And again, it's preposterous in my view that these judges, the judicial branch obviously plays an important role in our three co-equal branches of government, but they should understand what their role is. And these activist judges who now somehow believe that they're in the position of making policy,

by undermining the president's legal authorities and orders bestowed upon him by the American people. He did the hard work and put his name on the ballot and ran for office. If these judges want to run for office and be president, go ahead and do that. Go make your policies. Go state your views and your opinions. But they are politicizing the bench

by undermining the president's legal authorities and orders bestowed upon him by the American people. He did the hard work and put his name on the ballot and ran for office. If these judges want to run for office and be president, go ahead and do that. Go make your policies. Go state your views and your opinions. But they are politicizing the bench