Tulsi Gabbard

The conversation was candid and sensitive. But as the President and National Security Advisor stated, no classified information was shared. There were no sources, methods, locations, or war plans that were shared.

The conversation was candid and sensitive. But as the President and National Security Advisor stated, no classified information was shared. There were no sources, methods, locations, or war plans that were shared.

The conversation was candid and sensitive. But as the President and National Security Advisor stated, no classified information was shared. There were no sources, methods, locations, or war plans that were shared.

That retweet came from my personal account, and I would have to go back to look at the substance of the tweet.

That retweet came from my personal account, and I would have to go back to look at the substance of the tweet.

That retweet came from my personal account, and I would have to go back to look at the substance of the tweet.

I maintain my First Amendment rights to be able to express my own personal views on different issues. Thank you. I yield back.

I maintain my First Amendment rights to be able to express my own personal views on different issues. Thank you. I yield back.

I maintain my First Amendment rights to be able to express my own personal views on different issues. Thank you. I yield back.

The conversation was candid and sensitive. But as the President National Security Advisor stated, no classified information was shared. There were no sources, methods, locations or war plans that were shared. This was a standard update to the National Security Cabinet.

The conversation was candid and sensitive. But as the President National Security Advisor stated, no classified information was shared. There were no sources, methods, locations or war plans that were shared. This was a standard update to the National Security Cabinet.

Yes, Ranking Member. My answer yesterday was based on my recollection or the lack thereof on the details that were posted there. I was not, and what was shared today reflects the fact that I was not directly involved with that part of the signal chat and replied at the end reflecting the effects the very brief effects that the National Security Advisor had shared.

Yes, Ranking Member. My answer yesterday was based on my recollection or the lack thereof on the details that were posted there. I was not, and what was shared today reflects the fact that I was not directly involved with that part of the signal chat and replied at the end reflecting the effects the very brief effects that the National Security Advisor had shared.

Yes, Ranking Member. My answer yesterday was based on my recollection or the lack thereof on the details that were posted there. I was not, and what was shared today reflects the fact that I was not directly involved with that part of the signal chat and replied at the end reflecting the effects the very brief effects that the National Security Advisor had shared.

My testimony is I did not recall the exact details of what was included there.

My testimony is I did not recall the exact details of what was included there.

My testimony is I did not recall the exact details of what was included there.

As the testimony yesterday continued on, there were further questions related to that, where I acknowledged that there was a conversation about weapons. And I don't remember the exact wording that I used, but I did not recall the specific details that were included.

As the testimony yesterday continued on, there were further questions related to that, where I acknowledged that there was a conversation about weapons. And I don't remember the exact wording that I used, but I did not recall the specific details that were included.

As the testimony yesterday continued on, there were further questions related to that, where I acknowledged that there was a conversation about weapons. And I don't remember the exact wording that I used, but I did not recall the specific details that were included.