Unnamed Friend
👤 PersonAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
I didn't at the time. I see it as an issue. I didn't recognize it. I failed to recognize it.
I didn't at the time. I see it as an issue. I didn't recognize it. I failed to recognize it.
The cell phone evidence in and of itself was extremely important. They said that she had searched Colchicine on her cell phone. They questioned her. They interviewed her using information they found in her cell phone to derive statements from her. In the end, the motion was denied. But that wasn't the end of this. Correct.
The cell phone evidence in and of itself was extremely important. They said that she had searched Colchicine on her cell phone. They questioned her. They interviewed her using information they found in her cell phone to derive statements from her. In the end, the motion was denied. But that wasn't the end of this. Correct.
I would say about two to five percent of criminal defendants get permission to appeal from the denial of a 440.
I would say about two to five percent of criminal defendants get permission to appeal from the denial of a 440.
Kaitlyn Conley has this right to the effective assistance of counsel. Just a month later. The appellate division ruled in Katie's favor, granted her a new trial, and ultimately dismissed the indictment against her. I think I screamed. I ran around my office telling everybody that we had won.
Kaitlyn Conley has this right to the effective assistance of counsel. Just a month later. The appellate division ruled in Katie's favor, granted her a new trial, and ultimately dismissed the indictment against her. I think I screamed. I ran around my office telling everybody that we had won.
Once a defendant's conviction has been reversed and the indictment dismissed, the appropriate remedy is discharge from custody. It's kindly released. Court's adjourned.
Once a defendant's conviction has been reversed and the indictment dismissed, the appropriate remedy is discharge from custody. It's kindly released. Court's adjourned.
You could see tears were dripping down Caitlin's face, and you could just see the father just reached over and said, come here and give me a hug. And they kissed and hugged, and then she hugged all the other family members, her mother and one of her sisters.
You could see tears were dripping down Caitlin's face, and you could just see the father just reached over and said, come here and give me a hug. And they kissed and hugged, and then she hugged all the other family members, her mother and one of her sisters.
I asked her, where are you going to eat? And she said, well, I got a McDonald's milkshake.
I asked her, where are you going to eat? And she said, well, I got a McDonald's milkshake.
The ruling from the appellate court says you can't use anything on Caitlin Connolly's cell phone. You take the cell phone out, what's left? Is it bare bones? Is there still meat out there that they can lock onto? Or is this totally going to make it very, very hard to argue that Caitlin Connolly did this again?
The ruling from the appellate court says you can't use anything on Caitlin Connolly's cell phone. You take the cell phone out, what's left? Is it bare bones? Is there still meat out there that they can lock onto? Or is this totally going to make it very, very hard to argue that Caitlin Connolly did this again?
The decision did not say Caitlin Connelly's innocent. It did not say the evidence was all wrong. What it said was there was a legal mistake in the trial that violated Caitlin's constitutional rights.
The decision did not say Caitlin Connelly's innocent. It did not say the evidence was all wrong. What it said was there was a legal mistake in the trial that violated Caitlin's constitutional rights.
So Katie's always maintained through the first and second trials or her lawyers did that, you know, potentially there's two other suspects.
So Katie's always maintained through the first and second trials or her lawyers did that, you know, potentially there's two other suspects.