Unnamed Guest
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
And when I asked the people that wrote that, I said, well, you thought it was spectacular. Why did you use that terminology? That's what was allocated to us in the kind of choices of what we could write. Why do you think there's this predisposition to refer to them as drones or call them that?
Like you would hear rotors, whirling of blades, something like that. Conventional propulsion.
Like you would hear rotors, whirling of blades, something like that. Conventional propulsion.
Like you would hear rotors, whirling of blades, something like that. Conventional propulsion.
And you don't recall hearing that from these? What else in general just doesn't add up with the conventional drone idea?
And you don't recall hearing that from these? What else in general just doesn't add up with the conventional drone idea?
And you don't recall hearing that from these? What else in general just doesn't add up with the conventional drone idea?
So in the 60 Minutes piece, they're showing, I believe it was USS Russell, where on the night they're doing drone, because that's all you can write when you're seeing something that does not appear to be able to hold a human. It makes sense. Of course, it's a drone. But what you're trying to do is, one, say the Pentagon knew and didn't dispel speculation that they were UFOs or UAPs.
So in the 60 Minutes piece, they're showing, I believe it was USS Russell, where on the night they're doing drone, because that's all you can write when you're seeing something that does not appear to be able to hold a human. It makes sense. Of course, it's a drone. But what you're trying to do is, one, say the Pentagon knew and didn't dispel speculation that they were UFOs or UAPs.
So in the 60 Minutes piece, they're showing, I believe it was USS Russell, where on the night they're doing drone, because that's all you can write when you're seeing something that does not appear to be able to hold a human. It makes sense. Of course, it's a drone. But what you're trying to do is, one, say the Pentagon knew and didn't dispel speculation that they were UFOs or UAPs.
And that is absolutely 100% false. And then additionally, you're implying that the word drone had any meaning in these ship logs. It is not only false, it is disingenuous. I have to say, it really pisses me off because I could have put them in touch with... dozens of direct eyewitnesses that could have told them the real shebang, what was going on.
And that is absolutely 100% false. And then additionally, you're implying that the word drone had any meaning in these ship logs. It is not only false, it is disingenuous. I have to say, it really pisses me off because I could have put them in touch with... dozens of direct eyewitnesses that could have told them the real shebang, what was going on.
And that is absolutely 100% false. And then additionally, you're implying that the word drone had any meaning in these ship logs. It is not only false, it is disingenuous. I have to say, it really pisses me off because I could have put them in touch with... dozens of direct eyewitnesses that could have told them the real shebang, what was going on.
And instead, you're minimizing a national security issue that a lot of people were affected by. And you're doing it with sleight of hand. I'm not holding back words. That's how I feel. And I want to dig deeper into that. But whatever, you get the meaning.
And instead, you're minimizing a national security issue that a lot of people were affected by. And you're doing it with sleight of hand. I'm not holding back words. That's how I feel. And I want to dig deeper into that. But whatever, you get the meaning.
And instead, you're minimizing a national security issue that a lot of people were affected by. And you're doing it with sleight of hand. I'm not holding back words. That's how I feel. And I want to dig deeper into that. But whatever, you get the meaning.
Yeah, so look, the exact line, and this is like a real point for me, because what 60 Minutes is doing is they're perpetrating a lie on the American public, something that is absolutely not true.
Yeah, so look, the exact line, and this is like a real point for me, because what 60 Minutes is doing is they're perpetrating a lie on the American public, something that is absolutely not true.
Yeah, so look, the exact line, and this is like a real point for me, because what 60 Minutes is doing is they're perpetrating a lie on the American public, something that is absolutely not true.
And this is something that I saw percolating through media outlets trying to say that the Bass Strait, this Hong Kong freighter, was launching and landing, by the way, these significant size UAP or UAS, whatever you want to call them. And you can read it on Wikipedia. It was propagated. Maybe it was the drive. It was propagated this false, false narrative.