User 3

But I think the court is also very concerned about setting a precedent that would open the door to further speech restrictions in the United States.

But I think the court is also very concerned about setting a precedent that would open the door to further speech restrictions in the United States.

But I think the court is also very concerned about setting a precedent that would open the door to further speech restrictions in the United States.

And I think that whatever the court does decide, whichever side it goes on, it will write its opinion in a way that is as narrow as possible to make it as limited as possible to this particular instance involving this app and this law without saying much more about future regulation of speech in the internet era.

And I think that whatever the court does decide, whichever side it goes on, it will write its opinion in a way that is as narrow as possible to make it as limited as possible to this particular instance involving this app and this law without saying much more about future regulation of speech in the internet era.

And I think that whatever the court does decide, whichever side it goes on, it will write its opinion in a way that is as narrow as possible to make it as limited as possible to this particular instance involving this app and this law without saying much more about future regulation of speech in the internet era.