Vince Colonese

When new leaders take office, they admit that they do want to make changes to the agencies, but they're concerned that there's a significant loss in expertise going on at the FBI, is the claim, including the abrupt retirement of an official running an office established in 2020 to uncover and reduce the risk of misuse of national security surveillance, arguably one of the Bureau's most important intelligence gathering tools.

When new leaders take office, they admit that they do want to make changes to the agencies, but they're concerned that there's a significant loss in expertise going on at the FBI, is the claim, including the abrupt retirement of an official running an office established in 2020 to uncover and reduce the risk of misuse of national security surveillance, arguably one of the Bureau's most important intelligence gathering tools.

When new leaders take office, they admit that they do want to make changes to the agencies, but they're concerned that there's a significant loss in expertise going on at the FBI, is the claim, including the abrupt retirement of an official running an office established in 2020 to uncover and reduce the risk of misuse of national security surveillance, arguably one of the Bureau's most important intelligence gathering tools.

I'm sorry. What is what did the Biden administration do with the FBI when it came to national security surveillance? Remind me, what did they do? Oh, that's right. They spied on parents going to school board meetings. They had FBI agents writing down their license plate numbers out in the parking lot.

I'm sorry. What is what did the Biden administration do with the FBI when it came to national security surveillance? Remind me, what did they do? Oh, that's right. They spied on parents going to school board meetings. They had FBI agents writing down their license plate numbers out in the parking lot.

I'm sorry. What is what did the Biden administration do with the FBI when it came to national security surveillance? Remind me, what did they do? Oh, that's right. They spied on parents going to school board meetings. They had FBI agents writing down their license plate numbers out in the parking lot.

They treated traditional Catholics as if they are radicals, extremist terrorists for merely attending a traditional Latin mass. They treated American citizens who supported President Trump as deserving of SWAT teams at their doors. They destroyed the lives of anyone they possibly could. And they did it under the guise of national security.

They treated traditional Catholics as if they are radicals, extremist terrorists for merely attending a traditional Latin mass. They treated American citizens who supported President Trump as deserving of SWAT teams at their doors. They destroyed the lives of anyone they possibly could. And they did it under the guise of national security.

They treated traditional Catholics as if they are radicals, extremist terrorists for merely attending a traditional Latin mass. They treated American citizens who supported President Trump as deserving of SWAT teams at their doors. They destroyed the lives of anyone they possibly could. And they did it under the guise of national security.

Spare us your lectures, New York Times, about what it means to uphold national security. You people weaponized it against American citizens. Lastly, then I'll move on from here, but I just – as I celebrate this coverage because I love what it actually reveals.

Spare us your lectures, New York Times, about what it means to uphold national security. You people weaponized it against American citizens. Lastly, then I'll move on from here, but I just – as I celebrate this coverage because I love what it actually reveals.

Spare us your lectures, New York Times, about what it means to uphold national security. You people weaponized it against American citizens. Lastly, then I'll move on from here, but I just – as I celebrate this coverage because I love what it actually reveals.

The New York Times says the bureau's webpage, that is the FBI's webpage, detailing the agency's leadership roles is in disarray with employees who have left still listed as working there. Now, the way The Times is describing this, the reason they want you to hear this is because they want you to think, oh, it's incompetent what's going on at the FBI. It's so crazy.

The New York Times says the bureau's webpage, that is the FBI's webpage, detailing the agency's leadership roles is in disarray with employees who have left still listed as working there. Now, the way The Times is describing this, the reason they want you to hear this is because they want you to think, oh, it's incompetent what's going on at the FBI. It's so crazy.

The New York Times says the bureau's webpage, that is the FBI's webpage, detailing the agency's leadership roles is in disarray with employees who have left still listed as working there. Now, the way The Times is describing this, the reason they want you to hear this is because they want you to think, oh, it's incompetent what's going on at the FBI. It's so crazy.

They're making all these changes. They can't even update their website. I'm here to tell you what the real takeaway is. They are firing people so quickly, they don't even have time to update the website to let people know. That's what I want. That's the pace I want. That's the aggression I want.

They're making all these changes. They can't even update their website. I'm here to tell you what the real takeaway is. They are firing people so quickly, they don't even have time to update the website to let people know. That's what I want. That's the pace I want. That's the aggression I want.

They're making all these changes. They can't even update their website. I'm here to tell you what the real takeaway is. They are firing people so quickly, they don't even have time to update the website to let people know. That's what I want. That's the pace I want. That's the aggression I want.

So a fun, fun piece from The New York Times here designed to mislead you on what's going on, but instead revealing some very, very interesting developments going on at the Federal Bureau of Investigation. We'll keep we'll keep digging in on this subject, I assure you, because it matters a great, great. Coming up, I'm going to talk about the economy with our in-house economists, the great E.J.

So a fun, fun piece from The New York Times here designed to mislead you on what's going on, but instead revealing some very, very interesting developments going on at the Federal Bureau of Investigation. We'll keep we'll keep digging in on this subject, I assure you, because it matters a great, great. Coming up, I'm going to talk about the economy with our in-house economists, the great E.J.