Viva Frei

Now they have a confirmed crime, a convicted felon. So now they don't have to make the argument, oh, it's not a political process. This is now a judicial one. We've got the convicted felon status. So we can go for impeachment 3.0 because we can now point to the actual crime upon which this impeachment 3.0 might be based.

Now they have a confirmed crime, a convicted felon. So now they don't have to make the argument, oh, it's not a political process. This is now a judicial one. We've got the convicted felon status. So we can go for impeachment 3.0 because we can now point to the actual crime upon which this impeachment 3.0 might be based.

Now they have a confirmed crime, a convicted felon. So now they don't have to make the argument, oh, it's not a political process. This is now a judicial one. We've got the convicted felon status. So we can go for impeachment 3.0 because we can now point to the actual crime upon which this impeachment 3.0 might be based.

They are that stupid and that kamikaze reckless in their pursuit of opposing Trump. Jamie Raskin, who was infamously caught on that mic saying, you know, we might have to declare civil war conditions when we disqualify Trump because of the insurrection clause. Well, Supreme Court came down and said, no, you can't do that. So let's find another way to do it.

They are that stupid and that kamikaze reckless in their pursuit of opposing Trump. Jamie Raskin, who was infamously caught on that mic saying, you know, we might have to declare civil war conditions when we disqualify Trump because of the insurrection clause. Well, Supreme Court came down and said, no, you can't do that. So let's find another way to do it.

They are that stupid and that kamikaze reckless in their pursuit of opposing Trump. Jamie Raskin, who was infamously caught on that mic saying, you know, we might have to declare civil war conditions when we disqualify Trump because of the insurrection clause. Well, Supreme Court came down and said, no, you can't do that. So let's find another way to do it.

Either impeach him before he takes office or impeach him right after he takes office. I don't think there's the political will to do it or the public support to tolerate it. But they're doing something. You're dealing with scoundrel scheme artists. And the only question is, what are they scheming about now behind closed doors?

Either impeach him before he takes office or impeach him right after he takes office. I don't think there's the political will to do it or the public support to tolerate it. But they're doing something. You're dealing with scoundrel scheme artists. And the only question is, what are they scheming about now behind closed doors?

Either impeach him before he takes office or impeach him right after he takes office. I don't think there's the political will to do it or the public support to tolerate it. But they're doing something. You're dealing with scoundrel scheme artists. And the only question is, what are they scheming about now behind closed doors?

This is one indication of what they could do with this convicted felon, because I think it is a little bit more than just the title for the next 10 days.

This is one indication of what they could do with this convicted felon, because I think it is a little bit more than just the title for the next 10 days.

This is one indication of what they could do with this convicted felon, because I think it is a little bit more than just the title for the next 10 days.

That was another thing I'm wondering. When Ratskin comes out and says, we've got to disqualify him for insurrection, maybe they're going to try something too. They had to certify the Electoral College results because they didn't get the conviction in time for that. Maybe they try to disqualify him now for being a convicted felon.

That was another thing I'm wondering. When Ratskin comes out and says, we've got to disqualify him for insurrection, maybe they're going to try something too. They had to certify the Electoral College results because they didn't get the conviction in time for that. Maybe they try to disqualify him now for being a convicted felon.

That was another thing I'm wondering. When Ratskin comes out and says, we've got to disqualify him for insurrection, maybe they're going to try something too. They had to certify the Electoral College results because they didn't get the conviction in time for that. Maybe they try to disqualify him now for being a convicted felon.

It's settled law, but settled law has never stopped them from trying. So they're definitely going to try something else. The only question is what.

It's settled law, but settled law has never stopped them from trying. So they're definitely going to try something else. The only question is what.

It's settled law, but settled law has never stopped them from trying. So they're definitely going to try something else. The only question is what.

Well, especially since the impeachment process, you know, it doesn't require a conviction of a high crime. It just requires one to allegedly have been committed. And so they say, oh, sure, it got tossed at the court level. But this report shows insurrection behavior.

Well, especially since the impeachment process, you know, it doesn't require a conviction of a high crime. It just requires one to allegedly have been committed. And so they say, oh, sure, it got tossed at the court level. But this report shows insurrection behavior.