Vladimir Putin

Our position is based on the assumption that the ceasefire would lead to a long-term peace.

Our position is based on the assumption that the ceasefire would lead to a long-term peace.

Our position is based on the assumption that the ceasefire would lead to a long-term peace.

Because we agree with the proposals for the ceasefire, but our position is based on the assumption that the ceasefire would lead to a long-term peace, something that would remove the initial reasons for the crisis.

Because we agree with the proposals for the ceasefire, but our position is based on the assumption that the ceasefire would lead to a long-term peace, something that would remove the initial reasons for the crisis.

Because we agree with the proposals for the ceasefire, but our position is based on the assumption that the ceasefire would lead to a long-term peace, something that would remove the initial reasons for the crisis.

How will the 30 days be used? Would that allow Ukraine to continue the forced mobilization for weapons to be supplied so those mobilized can be trained? Or will that not be done? And how are control and verification issues to be resolved? How will it be guaranteed to us that nothing of the kind will happen? I hope this is common sense. These are serious issues.

How will the 30 days be used? Would that allow Ukraine to continue the forced mobilization for weapons to be supplied so those mobilized can be trained? Or will that not be done? And how are control and verification issues to be resolved? How will it be guaranteed to us that nothing of the kind will happen? I hope this is common sense. These are serious issues.

Who will issue the order to cease fire and what is the price of such orders?

Who will issue the order to cease fire and what is the price of such orders?

We agree with the proposals for the ceasefire, but our position is based on the assumption that the ceasefire would lead to a long-term peace, something that would remove the initial reasons for the crisis.

We agree with the proposals for the ceasefire, but our position is based on the assumption that the ceasefire would lead to a long-term peace, something that would remove the initial reasons for the crisis.

Using this intelligence, using satellites, we are able to foresee Russian Red Army actions, to understand what kind of supplies they provide to the front line, to understand what kind of attacks they are already doing. By cutting that, we become almost blind. We still have some access to our own surveillance, but it's mainly short, mid-range surveillance.

Using this intelligence, using satellites, we are able to foresee Russian Red Army actions, to understand what kind of supplies they provide to the front line, to understand what kind of attacks they are already doing. By cutting that, we become almost blind. We still have some access to our own surveillance, but it's mainly short, mid-range surveillance.

You cannot prevail or you cannot destroy the enemy if you don't understand its actions.

You cannot prevail or you cannot destroy the enemy if you don't understand its actions.

We, by the way, would be ready to offer our American partners, when I say partners, I mean administrative, government structures, but also private companies, if they would show interest in working together. We have, of course, a lot of work to do. I want to say a significant amount of resources of this kind in Ukraine. Bingo.

We, by the way, would be ready to offer our American partners, when I say partners, I mean administrative, government structures, but also private companies, if they would show interest in working together. We have, of course, a lot of work to do. I want to say a significant amount of resources of this kind in Ukraine. Bingo.

The new administration is rapidly changing all foreign policy configurations. This largely coincides with our vision.

The new administration is rapidly changing all foreign policy configurations. This largely coincides with our vision.