Wade Miller

And it's okay to say that, and it's okay to scream for that.

You know, low-hanging fruit, I think they're starting to move on, which is to say, who's here who's not permanent, you know, and who's here under conditional statuses, asylum, refugee statuses, their green cards expire, their visas expire or can be expired soon.

Start vetting those groups and removing those populations, and then start taking a look.

You know, if someone raised their hands and took an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States and became a citizen—

and now they're out there advocating for Sharia courts and the undermining of our entire constitutional order, then those should be grounds to denaturalize.

If you're a natural-born citizen and you want to become a Muslim and say things like that, fine.

But if you were granted citizenship through a process and you took an oath and you're not satisfying that oath, then I think that that should be subject for review.

Right now, not a lot.

We have some people really pushing the envelope in good ways, like Chip Roy.

Some of the things he's proposing are really forward-leaning.

But there's others who will treat this kind of like in the days after, you know, George Floyd, when Republicans were supporting BLM.

And, you know, even though those of us who knew things knew that this was a Marxist entity,

A lot of the Republican conference is still kind of in this woke mode, and they'll say that they're opposed woke, but they won't say what I just said, because they will think that that is not politically savvy.

And I don't really care about being politically savvy.

I'm not speaking about individuals.

I'm speaking about

statistical trends in large groups.

But we should just be honest and say this.

And at the end of the day, if it comes down to the future of my country and my culture or not being politically savvy, I'm going to choose the former.

One, I would urge them to kind of push through this notion that we owe it to some of these communities.