Wesley Huff

Yeah, I mean, I think there's an inconsistency there. And you do see when the Big Bang is first hypothesized that there are individuals who are uncomfortable with that sounding like in the beginning. Because before that, the idea was that the universe was eternal.

Yeah, I mean, I think there's an inconsistency there. And you do see when the Big Bang is first hypothesized that there are individuals who are uncomfortable with that sounding like in the beginning. Because before that, the idea was that the universe was eternal.

Yeah, I mean, I think there's an inconsistency there. And you do see when the Big Bang is first hypothesized that there are individuals who are uncomfortable with that sounding like in the beginning. Because before that, the idea was that the universe was eternal.

And if you propose a point in time where everything starts to exist, well, that for, and you see some of these people are pushing back on it. They say things like, well, that sounds too religious. That sounds like a beginning point in time. And at that point, if there's a Big Bang, you have to figure out, OK, well, what's the Big Banger?

And if you propose a point in time where everything starts to exist, well, that for, and you see some of these people are pushing back on it. They say things like, well, that sounds too religious. That sounds like a beginning point in time. And at that point, if there's a Big Bang, you have to figure out, OK, well, what's the Big Banger?

And if you propose a point in time where everything starts to exist, well, that for, and you see some of these people are pushing back on it. They say things like, well, that sounds too religious. That sounds like a beginning point in time. And at that point, if there's a Big Bang, you have to figure out, OK, well, what's the Big Banger?

And I mean, that's ultimately it's a metaphysical religious question. How did that thing get kicked off?

And I mean, that's ultimately it's a metaphysical religious question. How did that thing get kicked off?

And I mean, that's ultimately it's a metaphysical religious question. How did that thing get kicked off?

Is this like Lawrence Krauss having a definition for nothing? I don't know. It's not nothing?

Is this like Lawrence Krauss having a definition for nothing? I don't know. It's not nothing?

Is this like Lawrence Krauss having a definition for nothing? I don't know. It's not nothing?

In theology, it's often described as the difference between understanding and comprehension, which my wife tells me are synonyms, and that's nonsense. But the idea is like, you can understand eternity as a long point in time. You can comprehend it.

In theology, it's often described as the difference between understanding and comprehension, which my wife tells me are synonyms, and that's nonsense. But the idea is like, you can understand eternity as a long point in time. You can comprehend it.

In theology, it's often described as the difference between understanding and comprehension, which my wife tells me are synonyms, and that's nonsense. But the idea is like, you can understand eternity as a long point in time. You can comprehend it.

How much water is in the ocean.

How much water is in the ocean.

How much water is in the ocean.

I can comprehend. Like, it's like, that's a lot of water. But when you start talking about like tens of thousands of gallons, I'm like, lost me.

I can comprehend. Like, it's like, that's a lot of water. But when you start talking about like tens of thousands of gallons, I'm like, lost me.