Menu
Sign In Search Podcasts Charts People & Topics Add Podcast API Blog Pricing

Will Baude

๐Ÿ‘ค Speaker
1738 total appearances

Appearances Over Time

Podcast Appearances

Calder v. Bull is where the court said the X plus factor clause only applied to punishment for a crime.

You know, it has been 228 years and it's still on the table of opinions Justice Thomas is willing to reconsider, which is, I think, a record for Justice Thomas.

This is also an opinion that the great William Winslow Krosky, who I've been writing about, thought was wrong.

And in previous opinions, Justice Thomas has cited Krosky's analysis.

The lead, unfortunately, does not get cited here.

But then Justice Thomas now has a new move, which is like, well, even if I can't overturn Calder v. Bull after 228 years, we should return to the original understanding of Calder v. Bull, which when it said... Which is broader, as he reads it.

When it said criminal law, it didn't mean the modern tests for criminal law.

It meant basically to first approximation, anytime the government is the person imposing the sort of the government is the real party imposing the the thing.

So it's a public wrong versus a private.

So it fits nicely into the Thomas Caleb Nelson at all theories of like public versus private rights in standing.

So for the same reason that Justice Thomas would resolve a lot of standing cases by saying, look, if the proper party in the civil civil case is a individual, but the proper party when it's public wrong is the government.

So he sort of bring that in here and say, in most cases, the inquiry will just come down to who enforces the law, the sovereign or the injured party.

And if the sovereign is the one enforcing a public wrong against you, then it's a crime.

Do you think that would be true for all the other criminal law provisions too?

Like all the, you know, the jury trial, right?

Because it's a Calder only rule.

Yeah, I'm saying, like, if Justice Thomas is suggesting that, like, the original understanding of criminal in 1798 in Calder was this test, should that also be the test for, you know, the fifth... If false claims act cases?

Yeah, but even like tax penalties, right?