Will Bode
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
Does that include the ones from today?
Does that include the ones from today?
Okay. Yeah. Okay. Yeah. It's a healthy number. It's starting to feel like June. Yeah. I would say, you know, these are not, they're, they're kind of getting some of the clunkers off their desks, but some pretty interesting ones. And let's talk about, I'm not going to promise two. We've been going for a while talking about various tangents, but we'll at least get through one.
Okay. Yeah. Okay. Yeah. It's a healthy number. It's starting to feel like June. Yeah. I would say, you know, these are not, they're, they're kind of getting some of the clunkers off their desks, but some pretty interesting ones. And let's talk about, I'm not going to promise two. We've been going for a while talking about various tangents, but we'll at least get through one.
Maybe we'll talk about two. Maybe start with, with Glossop.
Maybe we'll talk about two. Maybe start with, with Glossop.
Yeah, I don't know whose fault that was that that never happened, but that did not ever happen. So Glossop versus Oklahoma. I did dig into this one many months ago, and so I had to re-dig into it. But I remember some of it, and it actually looks like in a rare development, I took good notes last time. And so I can rely on those a little bit too. So one thing to note, so this involves a capital K.
Yeah, I don't know whose fault that was that that never happened, but that did not ever happen. So Glossop versus Oklahoma. I did dig into this one many months ago, and so I had to re-dig into it. But I remember some of it, and it actually looks like in a rare development, I took good notes last time. And so I can rely on those a little bit too. So one thing to note, so this involves a capital K.
Defendant, Glossop, and there was a previous case about him, Glossop versus Gross, but that was a totally different case because that was a civil suit challenging Oklahoma's lethal injection protocol. Okay. Which he lost. Yeah. But then they didn't execute him, I guess. Yeah. I mean, they still want to. But that has not happened. And it's now.
Defendant, Glossop, and there was a previous case about him, Glossop versus Gross, but that was a totally different case because that was a civil suit challenging Oklahoma's lethal injection protocol. Okay. Which he lost. Yeah. But then they didn't execute him, I guess. Yeah. I mean, they still want to. But that has not happened. And it's now.
Spoiler alert, that will not happen, at least anytime super soon. Okay, so let me try to make this long story somewhat short. Glossop was charged with a capital murder of Barry von Tries. It's occurred, you know, 1997, really long time ago. Everybody agrees he didn't personally commit the murder and that it was committed by this guy, Justin Tries. Glossop was the manager of this.
Spoiler alert, that will not happen, at least anytime super soon. Okay, so let me try to make this long story somewhat short. Glossop was charged with a capital murder of Barry von Tries. It's occurred, you know, 1997, really long time ago. Everybody agrees he didn't personally commit the murder and that it was committed by this guy, Justin Tries. Glossop was the manager of this.
Sneed. Yeah, sorry. Justin Sneed. I don't know why I wrote that. Tries is the victim. Tries is the victim. Oh, terrible notes. Sneed, who with Glossop worked at the hotel that von Tries owned. Glasswood was the manager, Sneed was the kind of, person who got a room for free and maybe did some help. He doesn't seem like he was a great hire.
Sneed. Yeah, sorry. Justin Sneed. I don't know why I wrote that. Tries is the victim. Tries is the victim. Oh, terrible notes. Sneed, who with Glossop worked at the hotel that von Tries owned. Glasswood was the manager, Sneed was the kind of, person who got a room for free and maybe did some help. He doesn't seem like he was a great hire.
And the state's theory was that Glossop paid Sneed to kill Fantrice and Glossop wanted to do this because he was embezzling money, was about to be fired. Whether that is true or not is disputed. Basically, the whole case depends on what Sneed said. There was no other direct evidence of any sort. There were some other kind of Things that were circumstantial, incriminating.
And the state's theory was that Glossop paid Sneed to kill Fantrice and Glossop wanted to do this because he was embezzling money, was about to be fired. Whether that is true or not is disputed. Basically, the whole case depends on what Sneed said. There was no other direct evidence of any sort. There were some other kind of Things that were circumstantial, incriminating.
Glossop had some money, wasn't totally clear where the money came from. Maybe he sold his TV, maybe not. But Sneed was key, right? Yeah. Glossop is tried and convicted. His conviction gets overturned for ineffective assistance. And then finally, he's retried and convicted in 2004. And that's the conviction that is the basis of this decision. So this case has been...
Glossop had some money, wasn't totally clear where the money came from. Maybe he sold his TV, maybe not. But Sneed was key, right? Yeah. Glossop is tried and convicted. His conviction gets overturned for ineffective assistance. And then finally, he's retried and convicted in 2004. And that's the conviction that is the basis of this decision. So this case has been...