Will Bode
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
They took this. I mean, now, you know, they don't take that many. Right. And maybe this is reminding them why. Maybe this case that they're living through and thinking like, oh, yeah, I remember why we don't take for the cases. What are we going to say? Does it really matter?
They took this. I mean, now, you know, they don't take that many. Right. And maybe this is reminding them why. Maybe this case that they're living through and thinking like, oh, yeah, I remember why we don't take for the cases. What are we going to say? Does it really matter?
And I guess also the question is, what is the nature of the mistake? So I think here, you know, the officer, what they're trying to do is enforce the law. Like, I think everybody assumes that he is allowed to try to effectuate this traffic stop and try to stop somebody from fleeing. And so you might especially want to say the officer doesn't flee.
And I guess also the question is, what is the nature of the mistake? So I think here, you know, the officer, what they're trying to do is enforce the law. Like, I think everybody assumes that he is allowed to try to effectuate this traffic stop and try to stop somebody from fleeing. And so you might especially want to say the officer doesn't flee.
forfeit the right to use deadly force just by enforcing the law um you know the officer tries to pull over a motorcycle gang full of heavily armed uh gangsters that may be foolish but he's not using that you know unreasonably using force if he then gets in a shootout with them yeah
forfeit the right to use deadly force just by enforcing the law um you know the officer tries to pull over a motorcycle gang full of heavily armed uh gangsters that may be foolish but he's not using that you know unreasonably using force if he then gets in a shootout with them yeah
Yeah. Yeah. But I want to really bring it in by somebody saying, you know, officers, you really just shouldn't jump on the car. I mean, even if you're allowed to, we just like to remind you, don't jump on the car.
Yeah. Yeah. But I want to really bring it in by somebody saying, you know, officers, you really just shouldn't jump on the car. I mean, even if you're allowed to, we just like to remind you, don't jump on the car.
Yeah. I think there's a small chance the court will instead decide to get on one of these issues and say, no, no, we've you know, we're just going to we're just going to pierce through and say this was a reasonable use of, you know, reasonable use of force. I don't think that'll happen.
Yeah. I think there's a small chance the court will instead decide to get on one of these issues and say, no, no, we've you know, we're just going to we're just going to pierce through and say this was a reasonable use of, you know, reasonable use of force. I don't think that'll happen.
It would take more affection for Fourth Amendment cases and even, you know, quasi Fourth Amendment cases than I think the court has.
It would take more affection for Fourth Amendment cases and even, you know, quasi Fourth Amendment cases than I think the court has.
I could imagine Justice Kavanaugh getting the assignment actually and laying out in dicta, or maybe now it's holding, laying out, you know, we want to reiterate four basic principles, like sort of like reiterate some excessive force factors in kind of his argument.
I could imagine Justice Kavanaugh getting the assignment actually and laying out in dicta, or maybe now it's holding, laying out, you know, we want to reiterate four basic principles, like sort of like reiterate some excessive force factors in kind of his argument.
common sense pro-cop language um but to remind you that like the officers make tough judgment calls the judges are not in a position to decide to jump on the car that said the fifth circuit was wrong to artificially limit the or even to the extent the fifth circuit artificially limited the inquiry we're now going to vacate and take another shot i can imagine him pushing to get that and maybe getting a chance to do that that's my that's my outside undercard prediction
common sense pro-cop language um but to remind you that like the officers make tough judgment calls the judges are not in a position to decide to jump on the car that said the fifth circuit was wrong to artificially limit the or even to the extent the fifth circuit artificially limited the inquiry we're now going to vacate and take another shot i can imagine him pushing to get that and maybe getting a chance to do that that's my that's my outside undercard prediction
So I think โ also I think the way the question is asked is good. So I think it's unlikely to be the case that any state โ takes the plunge to say we are hereby rebanning same-sex marriage or banning all contraception.
So I think โ also I think the way the question is asked is good. So I think it's unlikely to be the case that any state โ takes the plunge to say we are hereby rebanning same-sex marriage or banning all contraception.
I think you could imagine Louisiana interpreting sort of what counts as abortion in a way that does block some major methods of contraception and then kind of re-triggers this question. I think you could imagine that happening. I think there are a critical mass of justices in the court who believe in stare decisis when they want to. I mean, which is good enough.
I think you could imagine Louisiana interpreting sort of what counts as abortion in a way that does block some major methods of contraception and then kind of re-triggers this question. I think you could imagine that happening. I think there are a critical mass of justices in the court who believe in stare decisis when they want to. I mean, which is good enough.