Menu
Sign In Search Podcasts Charts People & Topics Add Podcast API Blog Pricing

Will Bode

๐Ÿ‘ค Speaker
1204 total appearances

Appearances Over Time

Podcast Appearances

Divided Argument
Reference Check

All questions, yeah. Yeah. So it didn't really get a lot of uptake, but also the court doesn't mention it, doesn't discuss it. And you could even imagine sometimes having that kind of like aggressive argument when you're the respondent might help get the court to unanimity on the smaller question.

Divided Argument
Reference Check

All questions, yeah. Yeah. So it didn't really get a lot of uptake, but also the court doesn't mention it, doesn't discuss it. And you could even imagine sometimes having that kind of like aggressive argument when you're the respondent might help get the court to unanimity on the smaller question.

Divided Argument
Reference Check

Like there might've been people who were like, well, if we have to get into it, yeah, I kind of want to overturn Grable, but let's just say that Ashley wins so we don't have to.

Divided Argument
Reference Check

Like there might've been people who were like, well, if we have to get into it, yeah, I kind of want to overturn Grable, but let's just say that Ashley wins so we don't have to.

Divided Argument
Reference Check

That's a good question. I think some of these are points that have not come up as often in the Supreme Court.

Divided Argument
Reference Check

That's a good question. I think some of these are points that have not come up as often in the Supreme Court.

Divided Argument
Reference Check

self-consciously written as a slightly elegant primer of diversity and removal jurisdiction and maybe designed to settle some things.

Divided Argument
Reference Check

self-consciously written as a slightly elegant primer of diversity and removal jurisdiction and maybe designed to settle some things.

Divided Argument
Reference Check

I was wondering if either the First Circuit cases were thereby. Are these Boudin or Selya opinions who might sometimes get the J? Well, there is a way to find out. I'm going to

Divided Argument
Reference Check

I was wondering if either the First Circuit cases were thereby. Are these Boudin or Selya opinions who might sometimes get the J? Well, there is a way to find out. I'm going to

Divided Argument
Reference Check

Yeah, and there's another First Circuit case cited in the same paragraph that's also a Celia.

Divided Argument
Reference Check

Yeah, and there's another First Circuit case cited in the same paragraph that's also a Celia.

Divided Argument
Reference Check

Actually, we did a lunch talk on the TikTok arguments earlier this week with my colleagues, and Aziz insisted on calling it Pafaka. And the more he talked about Pafaka, the more people laughed.

Divided Argument
Reference Check

Actually, we did a lunch talk on the TikTok arguments earlier this week with my colleagues, and Aziz insisted on calling it Pafaka. And the more he talked about Pafaka, the more people laughed.

Divided Argument
Reference Check

Well, right. So it has a two-pronged test that applies to TikTok and that has a definition of basically large apps and says that they cannot be controlled by a foreign adversary, which is a small set of countries, including China.

Divided Argument
Reference Check

Well, right. So it has a two-pronged test that applies to TikTok and that has a definition of basically large apps and says that they cannot be controlled by a foreign adversary, which is a small set of countries, including China.

Divided Argument
Reference Check

And requires any TAC or any such company to divest, to be divested from its foreign control ownership if it wants to keep operating in the United States after January 19th, 2025.

Divided Argument
Reference Check

And requires any TAC or any such company to divest, to be divested from its foreign control ownership if it wants to keep operating in the United States after January 19th, 2025.