Yuval Rooz

If you could have defined contradiction, that tweet would be one big contradiction.

Yeah, I think that tweet came from a person who should, I don't know, think about anger management or being at least consistent.

It just seems like because it's a surveillance machine, but you can't see anything.

I mean, like, it's just like it's just so contradictory within itself.

that it's not even worth, in my opinion, responding to it.

And this is, I'm actually, there are some good anti, you could look at someone that I was going back and forth with yesterday.

I'm actually very much in favor of being kind of like very open because like I said,

We haven't gotten everything right.

Who are the good critics?

I don't know his name, but I can find, I can find yesterday we were having back and forth.

But, but,

But here's my only challenge to what you said, Ryan, is the following.

When it comes to an asset, you are opening yourself to the censorship or let's just say the issuer doing certain things that you wish they didn't.

Where I think I have a disagreement, and this is important, is that Canton Network is

as a composability layer is public permissionless, meaning no one, if I didn't do anything wrong with my DTCC treasuries and you didn't do anything wrong with your USDC, no one, no one can prevent us from composing that transaction between one another.

Right?

And that's the only disagreement that I have with you is that that composability layer, what the super validators are running, is a trustless, permissionless place where everybody can come and participate.

Now, you could say to me that the super validators...

can censor transaction and decide that they don't want to allow you to compose.

And I would say, we're back to the conversation I have with David.