Zach Lahn

Here we go.

In these emails, what you see is a captured agency.

The EPA's captured.

But you also see a lot of internal emails between Monsanto executives and people at Monsanto and each other.

So for instance, when the EU was saying, this formulation that you use in the United States, we are not gonna allow you to use, it's with something called POEAs, polyoxyethylated taloanines.

It's actually the product within glyphosate, within Roundup.

that they formulate to have it break down the skin, basically, of the plant to allow it to enter the plant easier.

Well, it does that on human skin, too.

It actually operates on fat.

And so... And this is... I'll get into this in a little bit, but this is part of what they don't want people to talk about, is that they'll always say glyphosate is safe,

And they will not talk about glyphosate-based herbicides, which are known to be far more toxic because the product can actually get in your bloodstream quicker and more efficiently.

So one of the emails that was shared between the Monsanto EU representative and the US company, after they reformulated it to make it safer for the EU, the email went out that said, why would we continue to make a harmful product when we can make a safer one?

And they didn't change a thing.

They know how to make these products safer.

We have their internal communications to know that they're lying to us.

But instead of owning up and putting a warning on the label, which is what they would have to do to stem the tide of a lot of this, they're going after state houses and trying to get immunity.

They're putting in the farm bill to get immunity.

They're now pushing the Supreme Court to get immunity.

and they now have an executive order which just to dispel any confusion does not exclude immunity at all meaning there's nothing in that executive order that says that it does not apply to product liability i mean we just saw i mean you we're just talking about it before the before we sat down here i mean we

That's what I saw.