CentOS: When a Corporate Shift Sparked a Community Revolution in Open Source

In December 2020, Red Hat, a major player in enterprise Linux and a subsidiary of IBM, announced a strategic shift that sent shockwaves through the global tech community: the end of CentOS Linux, the stable, free, community-driven version of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL). Instead, CentOS would become CentOS Stream—a rolling, upstream development branch of RHEL, effectively turning it into a testing ground rather than a reliable production platform. This decision left countless organizations, from small businesses to large data centers, vulnerable, as they relied on CentOS for stable, cost-free infrastructure. The move was widely perceived as a corporate maneuver to push users toward paid RHEL subscriptions, undermining the trust of the open-source community that had long supported Red Hat’s ecosystem. In response, a powerful wave of community-led innovation emerged. Within months, two major alternatives arose: Rocky Linux, founded by a CentOS co-creator, and AlmaLinux, launched by CloudLinux Inc. AlmaLinux was designed as a binary-compatible, drop-in replacement for RHEL, offering stability, long-term support, and adherence to the principles of open source. Crucially, it was built not just by a company, but with and for the community, culminating in the creation of the AlmaLinux OS Foundation to ensure transparent, community-led governance. This shift was essential in restoring trust after the CentOS disruption. AlmaLinux quickly gained traction, becoming a vital lifeline for enterprises needing a free, enterprise-grade operating system. However, the drama deepened in 2023 when Red Hat began restricting access to RHEL source code, making it available primarily through its customer portal, despite the software being licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2 (GPLv2), which legally requires source code to be freely available to anyone who receives the compiled software. This created a significant challenge for downstream projects like AlmaLinux, which depend on that source code to maintain compatibility. Yet, the AlmaLinux team adapted, finding compliant methods to access and rebuild the code, demonstrating the resilience and ingenuity of open-source development. The ongoing tension highlights a broader conflict in the tech world: the balance between corporate sustainability and the foundational ideals of open source—freedom, collaboration, and shared innovation. AlmaLinux’s success underscores the power of community-driven projects to respond to corporate decisions, ensuring that critical digital infrastructure remains accessible and reliable. Today, AlmaLinux stands as a fully mature, enterprise-ready operating system with strong adoption across hosting providers, small businesses, and cloud environments. Its existence ensures that organizations without large IT budgets can still run secure, stable systems. More than a technical alternative, AlmaLinux represents a philosophical stand for the open-source ethos—a reminder that when transparency is threatened, communities can and will build alternatives that uphold the values of accessibility and collective ownership. As digital infrastructure becomes increasingly central to modern life, projects like AlmaLinux play a quiet but essential role in maintaining the stability and democratization of the internet. Their story is not just about code, but about the enduring power of collaboration in the face of centralized control.

There are no comments yet.

Please log in to write the first comment.