The legitimacy of executive powers during a state of emergency

“Crisis” is a catch-all phrase used in modern rhetoric typically attached to any movement or belief that aims to point out an issue. However, it is as important as ever to rationally conclude what constitutes a crisis, and to what extent eras of “crises” defend government intervention. In this episode, Acton Institute’s research associate and librarian Dan Hugger sits down with participants of Acton’s Emerging Leader program, Grace Hemmeke, Ben Luker, and Jeremy Ward to discuss their Capstone project on the rights and responsibilities of government action in times of crisis. The three Emerging Leaders discuss the ordered role of the United States government during times of crisis through the Acton Institute’s framework of a free and virtuous society, characterized by individual liberty, and sustained by religious principles. Their research was prompted by the government’s role in the COVID-19 crisis, and is extended to practical judgement in both historical and current analysis of catastrophic periods. Are crises an agent in government force and control? And how will American society return to normalcy if and when this Coronavirus crisis is ever over? COVID-19 bailout unleashed a pandemic of fraud Is big government a near occasion of sin?  COVID-19: the tyranny of experts  Acton Line | Covid relief bill’s side effects on our future economy  Subscribe to Acton Vault podcast Subscribe to Acton Unwind podcast  Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

There are no comments yet.

Please log in to write the first comment.