Arxiv. Why Smart Prompts Don’t Always Work: The Limits of In-Context Learning

Have you ever wondered how large language models like GPT or Gemini can instantly understand what you want — with just a couple of example lines? No fine-tuning. No retraining. Just... understanding. That’s the magic of in-context learning, and in this episode, we go deep beneath the surface to uncover the mechanics — not just the tricks.🔍 Guided by a research paper from Google DeepMind, we explore:Why in-context learning works (and when it doesn’t)How prompts and prefixes actually influence model behaviorWhat soft prompts are, and why they might outperform plain textThe fundamental limits of prompting as a technique📚 The paper, "Understanding Prompt Tuning and In-Context Learning via Meta-Learning", reveals that prompts aren’t just about choosing the right words — they work because the model updates its internal task representation based on the input context. In other words, it performs a form of Bayesian inference on the fly — no weight changes needed.But here’s the catch:This only works if the task was already present in the training dataAnd if it’s a single, well-defined task, not a mixture of multiple🎯 Here’s the twist: even powerful soft prompts, which modify the model’s internal activations directly, can’t overcome these theoretical limits. If you need a model to handle a totally new or composite task, you’ll likely need weight tuning — via LoRA or full fine-tuning.💡 One mind-blowing result? An untrained transformer model, with the right soft prefix, came surprisingly close to optimal performance. This suggests that the architecture alone holds innate context processing capabilities. 🤯📈 Why this matters for you — whether you're building products or researching AI:Learn when prompting is enough — and when it’s notUnderstand the theoretical boundaries that no amount of tokens can bypassConsider the emerging potential to transfer soft prompts across different models — a future “knowledge layer” for AI?🎧 Don’t miss this episode if you work with LLMs, build AI tools, or just want to understand why these models "get it" — and where that understanding hits its limit.👇 Tell us:What surprised you the most? Are you using soft prompting in your own work?Key Takeaways:In-context learning is Bayesian inference over context, not memorizationSoft prompts can manipulate internal model states more effectively than hard tokensPrompting hits a wall on mixed or novel tasks — weight tuning is needed thereSEO Tags:Niche: #incontextlearning, #softprompting, #metatraining, #bayesianinferencePopular: #AI, #neuralnetworks, #machinelearning, #GPT, #LLMLong-tail: #promptinglimitations, #incontextvsweighttuning, #contextbasedlearningTrending: #transformers2025, #GoogleDeepMind, #LoRARead more: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.17010

There are no comments yet.

Please log in to write the first comment.