Menu
Sign In Search Podcasts Charts People & Topics Add Podcast API Blog Pricing
Podcast Image

American Alchemy with Jesse Michels

BREAKING: New Scans Show Massive Structures Under the Pyramids

15 Mar 2026

Transcription

Chapter 1: What is discussed at the start of this section?

1.246 - 27.023

This is the best technology that can scan inside of the Great Pyramid that are undiscovered features. Do any of these structures that they're interpreting fly in the face of what conventional archaeology would think exists inside the pyramids? All of it. All of it. All of it. There is also electricity inside this. Fossilized lightning through these iron veins.

0

27.804 - 31.049

What is creating the lack of signature here?

0

Chapter 2: How does scanning technology challenge conventional archaeology?

35.657 - 63.013

There is something. I can't disclose it now. Interesting. Each pyramid is producing a specific chemical, and the sequence of these chemicals transforms one product into the next product into the next product. Industrial-scale chemical manufacturing. If we do have tubular structures, pillars, with coils wrapping around them that go a kilometer deep with a foundation underneath them, that's insane.

0

63.093 - 77.401

That's huge. Correct, yeah, and it's something that needs to be addressed. because there's no physical way that these could possibly have been built. Period. Then I'm going with aliens.

0

Chapter 3: What are the implications of the new findings beneath the pyramids?

80.246 - 105.391

Like, how do we explain that? For over 4,000 years, the pyramids of Egypt have stood as some of the most extraordinary structures ever built by human hands. The Great Pyramid of Khufu on the Giza Plateau contains roughly 2.3 million stone blocks, some weighing as much as 70 tons, arranged with a precision that still astonishes engineers today.

0

106.613 - 133.455

The first and most obvious question everyone asks is how these insanely large, sophisticated, and astronomically aligned structures were built in ancient times, before modern civil engineering. Archaeologists and historians have proposed several main theories. French architect Jean-Pierre Houdin suggests that an internal ramp spiraling within the pyramid structure itself carried the blocks.

0

134.116 - 155.809

This is an idea that gained renewed interest after the Scan Pyramids project detected unexplained voids inside the Great Pyramid. Other proposals involve lever systems, counterweights, and complex lifting techniques hinted at by ancient historians like Herodotus. And then, of course, you have the Atlantean acoustic levitation crowd. Always a good time, and I can't hate on them.

0

156.089 - 176.139

But the point is, all of these theories have serious issues with them and are incredibly speculative. And there's another, even more simple question we take for granted, and one that's probably even more interesting when it comes to the pyramids. Why were they built in the first place? The most widely accepted explanation is the royal tomb theory.

0

176.539 - 201.86

Most Egyptologists believe the Great Pyramid was built for the Pharaoh Khufu around 2500 BC as part of a massive funerary complex designed to help the king ascend to the afterlife. And the Pyramid of Khafre was of course built for the tomb of Pharaoh Khafre, Khufu's son. But no confirmed mummies or tombs of Khufu or Khafre have ever been found inside of the pyramids.

Chapter 4: How do the new theories about the pyramids differ from traditional views?

201.88 - 226.581

And the interior chambers themselves are surprisingly bare. And so in the last few decades, some very alternative ideas have emerged for what the pyramid's true purpose may have been. One of the most famous of these comes from former aerospace engineer and Joe Rogan guest, Christopher Dunn. Dunn proposed that the Great Pyramid might have functioned as an ancient energy machine.

0

227.337 - 248.937

In his view, the pyramid's internal chambers, granite structures, and resonant geometry may have all worked together to generate power, possibly through vibrations interacting with quartz crystals inside the stone. Researcher Jeffrey Drumm, who runs the amazing Land of Chem YouTube channel, believes the pyramids weren't producing electricity at all.

0

249.417 - 267.385

They were harnessing atmospheric electricity and producing hydrogen gas and ammonium-based compounds essential for metalworking and agriculture, something ancient civilizations needed. And my hypothesis for the function of the Great Pyramid is that the hydrogen sulfide gas

0

267.365 - 289.679

coming from this subterranean karst cave and tunnel system is the initial reactant in the chemical manufacturing sequence within the great pyramid according to drum different chambers inside the pyramid could have served as reaction vessels where chemicals like zinc and acid interacted generating hydrogen through controlled reactions.

0

290.099 - 311.504

These fascinating open questions, how and why the pyramids got built, became infinitely weirder in 2022. That's when a small team of researchers, led by Italian radar specialist Filippo Biondi and his engineering colleague Corrado Molonga, made one of the boldest claims in the last century involving ancient archaeology.

312.025 - 334.83

Using a technique called synthetic aperture radar Doppler tomography applied to satellite data, they claim to have detected eight enormous cylindrical tubular structures going beneath the Giza Plateau. possibly including large vertical shafts and chamber-like formations extending hundreds of meters below the pyramids themselves.

335.17 - 350.089

We are counting at the moment four plus four cubes that are descending underneath, and they are connecting the top, so the base of the pyramid, to something that is located at the bottom.

350.272 - 366.208

So tonight on American Alchemy, we are hosting a historic roundtable discussion between Jeffrey and none other than Filippo Biondi himself, the man who conducted the scans and created the method that derived the images of these large columns below the pyramids.

366.769 - 386.29

The result was probably the deepest conversation that's ever been had on the structure and purpose of the pyramids and the vast complex of subterranean structures that might lie beneath them. Modern disclosure might not involve modern technology, but rather ancient technology hidden in plain sight.

Chapter 5: What features were detected around the King's Chamber?

7913.354 - 7938.591

Yeah. So, so my next question here, and as we'll see in just a moment, the SAR team is, has detected some features that go around the king's chamber. Filippo, you were- So that is the king's chamber. Yeah, here A. They say that A is the king's chamber. Correct. And as I'll show, you know what I'm talking about. The features that go around the king's chamber.

0

7939.272 - 7964.508

So why do you think that they haven't shown that when you're picking it up on your data? And I'll fast forward. a little bit here, this 3D diagram. Yes. So here is the big void. Yeah. You're showing it more transverse. Transverse, like that, yes. They're detecting it as more longitudinal. Their scans show it north to south. Yeah. Yours is showing it east to west. Yeah.

0

7965.129 - 7972.78

And you're detecting these features that are possibly connected into the big void. Yes. That go around. Yes.

0

Chapter 6: What are the limitations of tomographic detection?

7972.76 - 7980.673

The king's chamber. This is the king's chamber here at the center. The top of the king's chamber. The top of the king's chamber. Correct, yeah.

0

Chapter 7: How does background noise affect scanning technology?

7980.693 - 8014.571

And then you have this feature here. We can also overlap the results of the moon with that. Right, right, yeah. We can put it one on one. So my question is, why is nothing like that shown here when you are detecting it on your data? I don't know why. Because they are not able to detect things. Jeffrey, in that results... I'm a scientist, so I am very used to read the mess. Yes.

0

8014.711 - 8041.347

Information inside things that... I'm seeing nothing there. Can I ask it differently? I'm sorry, but I'm seeing nothing. No, I agree. This is very difficult to read. Can I ask it differently? Sure. Are there other examples... of things where muon detection fell short as far as predicting a structure that we know existed. We know the structure existed, muons fell short.

0

Chapter 8: What are the implications of new discoveries beneath the pyramids?

8041.688 - 8058.449

There's another comparison coming up here in just a moment of the scan results where it's not showing something that the SAR team. So again, there hasn't been much competition in the archeological space where we're comparing these different technologies.

0

8058.889 - 8068.1

So now we're in a unique position where there is a competitor technology to the muon scanning where we're saying, okay, this is showing this, this isn't showing it.

0

8068.48 - 8087.802

Sometimes this, you know, so there's, this is- But I mean, in any archeological or scientific context, like, cause that would be really helpful because if it's like muons never miss, then I'm like, okay, you got a false positive on the Sardoppler demography. If it's like, but there are a few times where muons do miss in these other cases. I do think that's illustrated. Yeah, yeah.

0

8088.143 - 8106.801

And again, I would love to see some control. Yeah, so we have a king's chamber here and I could move the... Oh, that's the king's chamber. This is the king's chamber, A. And this is the grand gallery here. And what Filippo's team is detecting is a structure that goes around the king's chamber here. But I think I saw...

0

8106.781 - 8138.093

in those results, in these horizontal pictures, more pictures, which I repeat is the sum of all the horizontal layers that I tell here publicly. The research team of MoonTeam There is a method to discriminate different layers. Right. They are not applied. To pull slices. Yes. They're just looking at the composite image. At the sum. Yeah. Correct. You can, you can do it. Okay. They can do it.

8138.113 - 8166.18

Okay. Maybe I can move. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Go for it. So this, this is the top of the Z. Correct. Okay. Yeah. So it's looking down at the top of the pyramid. Correct. Okay. This is, let's say, is the king's chamber. Correct. A is the king's chamber in these images, yeah. Then, this is something related to the grand gallery. Correct. B, the arrow pointing to B, is the grand gallery, correct.

8166.561 - 8205.592

On the other hand, they are detecting the king's chamber on another view angle. Yes, yes. Obviously, B... This is the grand valley. Yep. Okay. So we have two different view angles, this geometry and this geometry. Very good. And also other geometries, this and also this. The important thing that I am observing that here you have two things, this and this. Yeah. That's, that's the new void. Wait.

8206.373 - 8243.494

Yes. And this. Yep. Here you have only this. Why here you have only this and here you have this and this? Which is the difference? Because their orientation seems similar. Why? There's written on the paper. Yes. Why? Yeah, yeah, here. Because I tell you what is, they are confusing something. Yeah, so here are the explanations of the positioning And this breaks down the whole graph.

8243.994 - 8276.098

And then here on this side are sort of the... Yes, the reflectivity. Okay. Can we go to the previous slide, please, Jeffrey? Okay. It can be that this is the Grand Gallery top roof and this is the Grand Gallery floor. And they are, in Italy, we'll say, taking cazzi per contrabbassi. No? Taking, what do you mean? No, no, don't say it. Taking liberties. No, don't say it. Don't say it.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Please log in to write the first comment.