This fall the supreme court is going to hear a case about Andy Warhol's paintings of the artist known as Prince. Specifically, the legal concern is if the images violate the copywrite law with a portrait of the musician. Essentially, they are deciding "what is art?" Why is this coming up now? The Andy Warhol foundation has licensed work that was originally based on a single-use license. It's complicated and I have lots of questions. Let me know what you think on Instagram. Want to know how to make sure you're protected? Check out podcast 44: Protect Your Art from Copycats and Freeloaders with Legal Expert Katie Lane
No persons identified in this episode.
This episode hasn't been transcribed yet
Help us prioritize this episode for transcription by upvoting it.
Popular episodes get transcribed faster
Other recent transcribed episodes
Transcribed and ready to explore now
3ª PARTE | 17 DIC 2025 | EL PARTIDAZO DE COPE
01 Jan 1970
El Partidazo de COPE
TNB Tech Minute: FTC Orders Instacart to Pay $60 Million Over Deceptive Practices
18 Dec 2025
WSJ Tech News Briefing
Hidden Gem Stocks We Love at the End of the Year
18 Dec 2025
Motley Fool Money
Google Undercuts the Field, OpenAI Builds an App OS, and China Accelerates
18 Dec 2025
The Daily AI Show
Lucy Liu
18 Dec 2025
Fresh Air
#2428 - Michael P. Masters
18 Dec 2025
The Joe Rogan Experience