Sapiens (Yuval Noah Harari)- Reviews and Summaries As Source

AI generated summary and discussion of Sapiens from online sources including critiques. Yuval Noah Harari's Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind argues that Homo sapiens dominates the world by uniquely believing in "things that exist purely in its own imagination, such as gods, states, money, and human rights". This capacity for fiction enables large-scale cooperation. The book outlines four major revolutions: the Cognitive Revolution (around 70,000 BCE), the Agricultural Revolution (around 10,000 BCE), the Unification of Humankind (around 34 CE), and the Scientific Revolution (around 1543 CE).Harari controversially views the Agricultural Revolution as a "trap" leading to harder work and worse diets compared to hunter-gatherer life. He considers concepts like money and human rights as "inter-subjective" realities existing in our collective imagination.Despite its popularity, Sapiens has faced significant academic criticism for being "light on science and data, and heavy on fact-free story-telling". Critics like Charles C. Mann noted a "whiff of dorm-room bull sessions" due to often unsourced assertions.Casey Luskin from the Discovery Institute argues against Harari's "scientifically weak and ethically uninspiring vision of human origins". Luskin highlights Harari's admission of the unknown drivers of the Cognitive Revolution and criticizes the idea that complex cognitive abilities arose from "accidental genetic mutations". He also challenges Harari's naturalistic view of religion as an evolved behavior based on "myths" for cooperation, suggesting instead the possibility of design by a "benevolent creator". Luskin presents anecdotal evidence from groups like the Santal, who recall a prior belief in a monotheistic God, contradicting Harari's evolutionary progression of religion. Furthermore, Luskin discusses Harari's deconstruction of human rights as imagined concepts within a materialistic framework, noting Harari's own concern that society might collapse if people realize human rights are not objectively real.The Reddit thread r/AskAnthropology highlights similar issues, with one anthropologist calling Harari a "clever but typical armchair dilettante". Common complaints include presenting unproven academic theories like the "cognitive revolution" and Dunbar's number as fact, and oversimplifying complex systems to fit a narrative. Some readers found their "BS radar going off" due to these issues.

There are no comments yet.

Please log in to write the first comment.