The Open Science Revolution: Building Trust with Transparency

Episode NotesEpisode SummaryIntroduction to Open Science – Asier Moneva introduces open science, emphasizing transparency and replicability as essential to modern research.Importance of Transparency – He explains how transparency builds trust, enabling other researchers to assess rigor and replicate findings accurately.Preregistration and Registered Reports – Asier discusses these practices, which require researchers to specify methodologies and hypotheses before data collection to reduce bias.Challenges in Adoption – He notes that implementing open science practices can be challenging due to academic pressures and resource limitations.The “Publish or Perish” Culture – We highlight how the pressure to publish quickly can conflict with the time-intensive requirements of open science.Academic Incentives and Misaligned Goals – We critique the academic reward system that often favors quantity over quality, which can detract from scientific rigor.Advantages for Public Accessibility – Open science also enhances public accessibility, making research available beyond academia and helping inform public policy.Ethical Considerations in Research – Asier emphasizes that open science fosters ethical research practices by reducing questionable practices like p-hacking and selective reporting.Benefits of Open Science for Collaboration – The approach encourages collaboration across disciplines and institutions, providing a more comprehensive understanding of complex issues.Real-World Example of Retraction – He mentions a case where a research paper was retracted due to lack of transparency, illustrating the importance of open science practices.Role of Preprints in Open Science – Asier advocates for preprints as a way to share research and receive feedback before formal publication.Challenges with Platform Fragmentation – He observes that the proliferation of research-sharing platforms can hinder accessibility if findings are scattered across multiple sources.Future of Registered Reports – Asier sees registered reports as a future standard, as they align research design with ethical and rigorous science.Open Science as a Solution to Publication Bias – Open science practices help address publication bias by promoting the dissemination of all research findings, regardless of outcomes.Closing Thoughts on Transparency – Open science is about ensuring reproducibility and holding science accountable, aiming to make research as transparent and accessible as possible.About Our Guest:Asier Monevahttps://asiermoneva.comhttps://nscr.nl/en/medewerker/asier-moneva/https://www.thuas.com/research/research-groups/team-cybercrime-cybersecurityhttps://github.com/amonevahttps://osf.io/7ce24/Resources and References Mentioned in This Episode:The Open Science Framework (OSF)The OSF is an open-source platform supporting transparent and reproducible research across disciplines.The Open Science Framework:https://osf.io/Paper Introducing Registered ReportsThis foundational paper outlines the concept of registered reports, a publishing model aimed at reducing bias and enhancing research rigor.Paper introducing "registered reports":https://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2014-20922-001.htmlRetraction Case StudyA recent retraction of a notable article on the replicability of social-behavioral research findings offers insights into challenges within open science practices.RETRACTED ARTICLE: High replicability of newly discovered social-behavioural findings is achievable:https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-023-01749-9Retraction Note: High replicability of newly discovered social-behavioural findings is achievable:https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-024-01997-3Podcast episode discussing the retraction in depth:https://open.spotify.com/episode/3rygrbUNocfCEEGd1Byn0V?si=vJDuzQT3S7yJqDEUMycF1w&t=178Other:This episode was recorded in a hotel lobby corner with music playing in the background. If the audio sounds a little unusual at times it is because of the noise removal being used to remove that noise being combined with other ‘sound enhancement’ features. I had to go back in and play around with the audio directly before I was even a little happy.  The tools work well but they are a little unpredictable.  I am increasingly wary of ‘it just works’ audio editing tools. I would have left it in, but the bots chasing copyright infringement are ravenous and indiscriminate. 

There are no comments yet.

Please log in to write the first comment.