Amy Coney Barrett: Judges Are Referees, Not Kings

Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett's views on the role of judges, which were articulated in an article for The Free Press. Barrett asserts that judges are not "kings" but "referees," emphasizing that their role is to interpret existing law rather than to create it or impose their personal beliefs. She highlights that judicial decisions should be constrained by law adopted through the democratic process, not by a judge's individual concept of justice. Barrett uses her own stance on the death penalty as an example, explaining that despite her personal moral objections, she must uphold the law as written to respect the choices of citizens. The article also notes a past instance where Barrett's judicial philosophy was contrasted with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's opinions, reinforcing her consistent stance on judicial restraint. The overall message underscores the importance of judges suppressing individual beliefs in deference to enacted law and the democratic process.Samuel Carter’s Books Get full access to Samuel Carter's Substack at therealsamuelcarter.substack.com/subscribe

There are no comments yet.

Please log in to write the first comment.