Menu
Sign In Pricing Add Podcast
Podcast Image

Digital Social Hour

The $10M Gap: Why Metabolic Health Research is Failing Us | Nick Norwitz DSH #908

Thu, 21 Nov 2024

Description

The $10M Gap in metabolic health research 💰🔬 Tune in as Harvard MD/PhD candidate Nick Norwitz breaks down why our approach to health is failing us! 🧠💪 Nick shares mind-blowing insights on: • Why he lowered his cholesterol with Oreos 🍪 • The shocking truth about carnivore diets and IBD 🥩 • How to reshape medical research incentives 💡 Packed with valuable insights on nutrition, metabolism, and the future of personalized medicine. Nick's unconventional experiments and academic expertise will challenge everything you thought you knew about health! 🤯 Don't miss out on this eye-opening conversation. Watch now and subscribe for more insider secrets on the Digital Social Hour with Sean Kelly! 🚀 Join the conversation and stay ahead of the curve in health and nutrition. #MetabolicHealth #NutritionScience #DigitalSocialHour #SeanKelly #NickNorwitz #KetogenicDiet #PersonalizedMedicine #metabolicwellness #metabolicsyndrome #lowcarblove #metabolicsyndrometreatment #metabolicdisorders CHAPTERS: 00:00 - Intro 00:27 - Nick's Current Research 04:48 - Oreo vs Statin Study 07:28 - Are Oreos Healthy? 11:25 - Business Model for Metabolic Health Studies 17:18 - Reshaping Medicine 19:54 - N=1 Medicine 23:54 - Carnivore Diet Study 27:50 - Nuanced Conversations on Controversial Diets 34:01 - Calories and Obesity Misconceptions 37:04 - Fuel Partitioning Explained 39:10 - Solutions for Obesity 42:05 - Dave Dama Discussion 45:45 - Oreos in Focus 50:10 - What's Next for Nick 52:34 - Where to Find Nick APPLY TO BE ON THE PODCAST: https://www.digitalsocialhour.com/application BUSINESS INQUIRIES/SPONSORS: [email protected] GUEST: Nick Norwitz https://www.instagram.com/nicknorwitz/ https://www.nicknorwitz.com/ https://www.youtube.com/@nicknorwitzPhD LISTEN ON: Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/digital-social-hour/id1676846015 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/5Jn7LXarRlI8Hc0GtTn759 Sean Kelly Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/seanmikekelly/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Audio
Featured in this Episode
Transcription

Chapter 1: What is the $10M Gap in Metabolic Health Research?

0.009 - 23.756 Host

This is interesting, because I think that interest in the general public actually has a lot of value. We'll talk about the citizen scientists later, but to cut to the story, I envisioned this experiment where I could use my understanding of new physiology, new metabolism, to lower my cholesterol, which a lot of people see as bad, with Oreo cookies.

0

26.457 - 31.738 Host

All right, guys, we got Nick Norwitz here today. He's working on some very interesting studies. Could you tell everyone what you're working on right now?

0

32.079 - 50.591 Host

Sure. I mean, I have my my foots in a lot of different puddles, but a lot of my research broadly right now is in metabolism. So cholesterol, lipid metabolism, particularly in low carb diet context. That's my area of interest. Things like carnivore diet, inflammatory bowel disease. We've got a lot going on, so we can start wherever you want.

0

Chapter 2: How Can Oreos Lower Cholesterol?

51.311 - 54.634 Host

We'll start with the one that made you break out in space, which was the Oreo one, right?

0

54.855 - 80.253 Host

Yeah. So me and my friends had been studying cholesterol dynamics, particularly in a low-carb context for some time. To give a little bit of framework to this – One of my areas of interest is in therapeutic carbohydrate restriction, so low carb diets, including ketogenic diets, which now are becoming very popular for far beyond things like diabetes and obesity.

0

80.914 - 99.568 Host

People may or may not know they had, or ketogenic diets have been used for about 100 years for epilepsy, but now they're being used for mental health disorders, inflammatory and autoimmune disorders, and the literature is picking up steam really fast. But a major obstacle to clinical implementation of ketogenic diets is cholesterol levels.

0

100.089 - 123.18 Host

Because some people see their cholesterol levels shoot through the roof. Like not just blip up, but go to levels that are so high that if a doctor sees it, they either think it was a lab error or that you have a one in one million genetic condition. Something like homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. So my history is I adopted a ketogenic diet back in 2019 for inflammatory bowel disease.

0

123.2 - 142.296 Host

It happened to work for me, but I was surprised to find I had this response, and my cholesterol shot through the roof. And so using myself as a case in point, you get caught between a rock and a hard place, right? It's like my levels are so high that some people think I might get a heart attack in a few years and die in my 20s.

143.177 - 156.589 Host

of heart disease, at the same time, this dietary intervention is working wonders for something that basically had me in palliative care, in the ICU. So there's a lot of patients, different conditions, that are caught between this rock and a hard place.

156.769 - 168.839 Host

And so the reason this is an area of interest is I kind of want to address this cholesterol boogeyman, particularly in that context, and start to unravel some of the really interesting metabolic mysteries

Chapter 3: What is the Business Model for Metabolic Health Studies?

169.58 - 194.119 Host

that i think are going on in what we've termed the lean mass hyper responders that term isn't really important right now we can break it down but getting to your question about the oreos you know i'm a total dork like i haven't introduced myself but like my background is i did cell bio and biochem at dartmouth i graduated valedictorian there and then went to oxford to do my phd metabolism now i'm finishing up my md at harvard medical school like

0

194.943 - 216.415 Host

I've done the most conventional of conventional trainings. My head has been stuck in books and academia, and it's been fun. I love engaging in that environment. But we're living now in a time where academia and the general public are colliding because the general public has access to information, which I think is awesome. We can have conversations like this and disseminate it to a bunch of people.

0

217.155 - 235.508 Host

But then you ask the question, how do you bridge that gap? and get people interested in, I've thrown out some terms now, I've talked about cholesterol, I've talked about lean mass hyper responders, maybe I'm losing people. The point is, how do I get people to turn to this and say, wow, this is interesting? Because I think that interest in the general public actually has a lot of value.

0

235.528 - 261.387 Host

We can talk about the citizen scientist movement later, but to cut to the story, I envisioned this experiment where I could use my understanding of new physiology, new metabolism, to lower my cholesterol, which a lot of people see as bad, with Oreo cookies. And that wasn't enough for me. I wanted to do it quite rigorously. So I wanted a comparison.

0

261.707 - 276.824 Host

The obvious comparison is the most common medication used for Oreo cookies, statins. So I used high dose statins. And, you know, I actually had a lipidologist consulting, a professor named William Cromwell, who's highly respected in academia.

277.224 - 300.215 Host

I went through the Harvard IRB, got the appropriate exemptions, you know, dotted my I's, crossed my T's, and then ran this protocol that we ended up publishing the data. So you can go look Oreo versus statin on PubMed. You will find it. And basically the intervention was I just did a run-in of my normal ketogenic diet, and then I added on Oreo cookies, one sleeve per day.

300.235 - 326.289 Host

So that's 12 cookies, about 100 grams of carbs, and did that for about two weeks. Then did a washout period of three months to kind of return to my baseline status, and then did high-dose statin therapy for six weeks. The results were that in my particular metabolic context, which I engineered to kind of do this metabolic demonstration, the Oreos lowered my LDL cholesterol.

326.63 - 348.838 Host

Some people call that the bad cholesterol. They lowered it by 71%. in two weeks. Wow. And this is not something I'm faking. This is going straight into my health record online in Epic to my PCP. I'm getting the labs done standard through. There's no faking that result. In fact, actually, the funny thing is if you look at the paper, it's a 16-day

Chapter 4: How Does N=1 Medicine Work?

350.299 - 368.065 Host

quote, two-week block, the reason it was 16 days and not 14 is because at 14 days, which was the second blood draw after the intervention started, the drop was so profound, me and my team decided, let's replicate this on two sequential days, so a triplicate, just to make sure this isn't a lab fluke. And actually at that point, my cholesterol was still going down.

0

369.606 - 387.691 Host

So it dropped 71%, and then the statin had the expected effect the statin would have, which is actually about, in my case, it was 32.5%. But the punchline was, the headlines ran, Harvard scientist, Harvard medical student, lowers cholesterol with Oreo cookies and they outperform a statin. This was an interesting thing for me.

0

388.091 - 408.196 Host

We can delve into the metabolism a little bit, but there was the one element of it, which was I wanted to do a metabolic demonstration for the metabolic demonstration's sake. There was the other element of it, which was a social experiment for me. Because I feel like we're living in a really exciting time. I alluded to it already.

0

408.236 - 431.811 Host

We're like academia, general public, social media, they're colliding. And I get to kind of like work at that interface. So what would the result be if I threw out a social media grenade like that? And would it facilitate productive discussion or just put everybody into an unproductive frenzy? And truth be told, I didn't know what the answer was, to be honest with myself.

0

431.891 - 450.171 Host

So there was always a gamble this could do more harm than good, and I was going to try to be honest and audit the effects. I would say I'm pretty confident it's had a positive effect. Really? Yeah, we can break that down. But I'll pause right now and just kind of get questions high level and explain why this happened or – anyway, go ahead.

Chapter 5: What are the Findings of the Carnivore Diet Study?

450.231 - 453.212 Host

Yeah, so it helped with the cholesterol, but I would argue Oreos are pretty unhealthy for you.

0

453.252 - 473.682 Host

Agreed. I agree. So that's the thing, right, is your visceral emotional response or anybody that's listening is – trying to put a value judgment on this. Because what you have here is an apparent paradox. Quote, bad intervention, do we agree Oreos, look, this wasn't a swap, so I wasn't like swapping out fats, I was adding Oreos.

0

474.242 - 494.262 Host

Do we agree that adding Oreos to the diet is probably an unhealthy intervention? And then people would think you're lowering your LDL, quote, bad cholesterol is a good thing, especially if you have exceptionally high levels to begin with. So what do we have here? Bad intervention coupled with good outcome. even if that's in only one patient, you have to grapple with that and say,

0

495.404 - 514.633 Host

How do we reconcile this? And I think the interesting thing and the reason among others that I knew this would go viral was that people are uncomfortable with that cognitive dissonance. When I say bad intervention, good outcome, I show that. They want to put a value judgment. They want to layer a value judgment like, oh, this proves LDL isn't a problem. I didn't say that.

0

514.854 - 531.103 Host

This proves statins are poison. I definitely didn't say that. This proves Oreos are healthy, question mark. I definitely didn't say that. I said none of those things. And so my whole shtick, you hear me say it again and again, is stay curious. I think curiosity is really what like lets us fully manifest our humanity.

531.863 - 553.498 Host

And so I invite people, I do a lot of now weird demonstration, put out provocative content, but not one that is actually like in any way dogmatic. It's just like, here's a curiosity and I want to invite you to investigate this with me rather than reflexively jumping to a value statement. And then when people do jump to that value statement, Kind of investigating, well, why did we do that?

553.978 - 578.092 Host

And how can we attenuate that response to actually have more productive dialogue? And I will tell you, you know, I was saying that I think the Oreo versus statin study had positive effect. It's been really funny. I mean, I've talked about this in academic circles, at Harvard, at conferences, universally in academia. People are like, wow, this is fascinating.

578.572 - 594.576 Host

And I get emails from clinicians, cardiologists, like, I read this study. and I was provoked to go down the rabbit hole of your literature, because we have a lot more studies on it. This was just kind of like a provocation to get people to look at those studies. And they're now saying, I understand the physiology of your model. It's called the lipid energy model.

594.956 - 612.639 Host

And now I have patients in the metabolic state you're in, but rather than jumping to medications, we're trying like carbohydrate, quote, titration protocol. So we're using bananas, sweet potatoes, and we're lowering LDL more than medications ever would. And so then the patient's happy, the doctor's happy,

Chapter 6: What Misconceptions Exist Around Calories and Obesity?

649.936 - 673.593 Host

If you gave me $10 million to do a study, I would never have needed to do this. But... But this is a way to get attention to then generate partnerships to get those funds. So right now we're designing a study with a really prestigious lab. I don't want to throw them under the bus in case this podcast goes sideways. But we're probably going to try to do like a $1.2 to $3 million multi-omic study.

0

674.214 - 685.131 Host

And this arose because the conversations I got to have because of doing something crazy like Oreo versus statin. So it's been a little bit of a ride, but it's been fun.

0

685.151 - 689.476 Host

That's interesting. So as an entrepreneur, what's the business side of these studies? Because you're spending millions to fund them.

0

689.536 - 709.7 Host

Then what? That is a critical question, and I'm going to reframe it, which is I would say the reason metabolic health studies don't get done is because there's not a clear business model. There's a very clear business model for pharmaceuticals, cell-based drugs.

0

710.281 - 732.279 Host

Metabolic health interventions don't immediately make people money, which actually sets up a really unfair comparator because when you go into medicine, people want, quote, evidence-based medicine. And that sounds sexy. It's great virtue signaling, right? We want the high-grade RCTs to prove this intervention works. However, if you have millions of dollars –

Chapter 7: How Can We Reshape Medical Research Incentives?

733.396 - 754.55 Host

not billions of dollars really, going into funding pharmaceutical trials, procedural trials, you're gonna have a larger body of literature on that than on something that actually doesn't have a clear business model. So I was actually talking with one of my professors at Harvard who added this, project he wanted to do would be about a $10 million project. Billion? $10 million. Oh, a million.

0

754.851 - 769.107 Host

Which actually sounds like a lot. But then I'm like, let's quantify this and do a comparison to see like, you know, what is, this is hard money to get for a metabolic health intervention that actually isn't easily monetizable. How does that compare to, say, Novo Nordisk market cap? Just name one company.

0

769.127 - 787.706 Host

And it ended up being that is the same as the mass comparisons of a chiro-spiny mouse versus two adult hippopotamuses. The pools of money are enormously different. Then you layer on to metabolic health interventions, which are like lifestyle diet interventions. Do them rigorously. It's expensive. It's hard to recruit, get ethics.

0

788.266 - 810.17 Host

And what you end up with is a research infrastructure that is biased wildly against these sort of interventions. So how do they get done? This is the really sad reality is there are now studies getting done But I think a lot of it is not coming from NIH funding. NIH doesn't have a ton of funding to throw at this compared to, say, pharma.

0

810.91 - 832.858 Host

But often philanthropists who are funding these trials because they've – or their family has suffered. And so, you know, I'm only in this space because I suffered terribly with inflammatory bowel disease. I mean, examples like the Bazooka Group, I don't know if you've heard of them. They're funding a lot of trials in metabolic psychiatry at Stanford, at Harvard.

833.278 - 848.003 Host

They gave a friend and colleague of mine, Chris Palmer, I think some several million dollars to start up like a metabolic psychiatry clinic at McLean. I don't know if they've branded it that exactly, but the only reason they're pouring money into this is because one of the members of the family suffered terribly with bipolar disorder.

848.863 - 874.786 Host

and ended up going into remission only with metabolic therapy in this case a ketogenic diet and so then they became passionate about this as something that is worth doing to help people but you see kind of like the disconnect there you have a business model for pharmaceuticals and on the other end you have a research environment that is being built on the backs of passionate people who have suffered right and people with different resources which is really unfortunate

875.703 - 896.115 Host

At the one level, it doesn't seem fair that it's happening that way. However, the silver lining I put there is that motivation and that purpose-driven energy, I think... is going to win the day in the end. Because the data will win the day in the end.

896.855 - 914.5 Host

And, you know, once you get enough people, and there's more and more of us who are suffering, and you have the right people suffering come together, then... Trauma bonding. Yeah, then you're going to get the studies done. And that's not to discount, like, you know, the New England Journal trials that prove a pharmaceutical is beneficial or say that pharmaceuticals aren't beneficial.

Chapter 8: What is Next for Personalized Medicine?

962.829 - 968.053 Host

I'm like, I know what's healthy. My plate five a day, quote, balanced diets, these platitudes we hear all the time.

0

970.287 - 997.963 Host

The fact of the matter is I don't consider that true hard science, but when you start to delve in to the metabolism and the fundamental physiology that really is kind of coming out in the preclinical literature mostly, so journals like Nature Metabolism, Cell Metabolism, that's my pleasure reading, you read things that... just make you stop and blow your mind.

0

998.123 - 1016.381 Host

And I can come up with a myriad of examples because these things come out all the time, like how the bile acids that we think, oh, they just digest fat, they can circulate in your body, go to your brain, bind to TGR5 receptors and affect depression. And this is in top-tier level scientific journals. Now, it is preclinical.

0

1017.602 - 1039.557 Host

you know, they're doing these mechanistic studies in mice and then people like to brush that away. But I want to like recognize that disconnect of like, what does it take to take that preclinical and make it clinical? It requires... the sort of research that is really hard to do unless there's a clear business plan. And kind of at the heart of the question, there isn't.

0

1039.577 - 1042.299 Host

So why do we do that? So then it just never gets studied.

1043.039 - 1063.741 Host

Yeah, I think we need to reshape the way, you know, medicine is very dysfunctional. That is not even a controversial statement to say. People think of medicine and hospitals as this giant entity that is all aligned. You go into a hospital, you're training in medicine. The doctors, the nurses, the healthcare workers, they will say, they will shout, this is a dysfunctional system.

1064.142 - 1082.467 Host

And we're just trying to do the best by our patients within it. which I fully believe, like the vast majority of physicians I've met are tirelessly hardworking and always trying to put their patients first and often martyring themselves in a system that is broken. Which is why I feel kind of like bad you hear a lot of doctor bashing because people get frustrated and they don't realize

1083.588 - 1100.356 Host

that the doctors are just as frustrated, if not more frustrated. And so you have these two parties that appear on social media to be warring when they could not be more aligned. It's just the broader incentive structures, which only a little bit, we've talked about the economics, say with respect to the research and pharmaceuticals, they're the things that are messed up.

1100.396 - 1122.853 Host

And so how do we restructure the incentive structure? How do we reshape medicine to be metabolic and foundational health-focused, preventative medicine, all of that, all the nice terms you hear? If I had a solve for you, if I had an answer for you, everybody listening should say I'm crazy. Because everybody's trying to – not everybody, but a lot of people are trying to solve this problem.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Please log in to write the first comment.