Is Proof of Stake a security? A Debate! Adam Cochran vs Adam Levitin

"I'll take the opposed, in that I think there is decent precedent to find ETH to not be a security in a post-merge environment.  Let's breakdown some specifics:" In this readthrough I'm going to Twitter for the first time to read a 43 long tweet thread (yup - 43 tweets) by @adamscochran, aka Adam Cochran, Partner at CEHV and Adj. Professor of Info Sci/Biz Analysis. He analyzes whether Ethereum's shift to Proof of Stake makes it eligible to be names a security by the SEC and analyzes Ethereum vs the Howie test, previous rulings in the US court system and theories of what different staking make ups could lead to. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 👉 Start learning with Alpe: https://link.alpeaudio.com/70to/d895de1 This episode is brought to you by Alpe Audio. Want to learn on the go but need more depth than a podcast? Alpe is the app for you. It’s an audio education app that brings great in depth courses that are as fun as podcasts but as educational as well, a degree. Each lesson comes with summaries, additional resources, flash cards and more. You can even find Ethereum Audible on Alpe with all those additional resources. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow Adam on Twitter: @adamscochran Adam Levitin's tweet thread making the case for why PoS is a security: https://twitter.com/AdamLevitin/status/1550990967670554624 Adam Chocran's tweet thread responding and making the case why PoS is NOT a security: https://twitter.com/adamscochran/status/1551278224218488832 Adam has put the thread into a website: https://isethereumasecurity.com/ Are you interested in Tokenomics? I'm collecting everything that I'm learning about tokenomics into a free email course & newsletter you can find here: https://designingtokenomics.com  

There are no comments yet.

Please log in to write the first comment.