LessWrong (Curated & Popular)

"More information about the dangerous capability evaluations we did with GPT-4 and Claude." by Beth Barnes

21 Mar 2023

Audio

Description

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/4Gt42jX7RiaNaxCwP/more-information-about-the-dangerous-capability-evaluationsCrossposted from the AI Alignment Forum. May contain more technical jargon than usual.This is a linkpost for https://evals.alignment.org/blog/2023-03-18-update-on-recent-evals/[Written for more of a general-public audience than alignment-forum audience. We're working on a more thorough technical report.]We believe that capable enough AI systems could pose very large risks to the world. We don’t think today’s systems are capable enough to pose these sorts of risks, but we think that this situation could change quickly and it’s important to be monitoring the risks consistently. Because of this, ARC is partnering with leading AI labs such as Anthropic and OpenAI as a third-party evaluator to assess potentially dangerous capabilities of today’s state-of-the-art ML models. The dangerous capability we are focusing on is the ability to autonomously gain resources and evade human oversight.We attempt to elicit models’ capabilities in a controlled environment, with researchers in-the-loop for anything that could be dangerous, to understand what might go wrong before models are deployed. We think that future highly capable models should involve similar “red team” evaluations for dangerous capabilities before the models are deployed or scaled up, and we hope more teams building cutting-edge ML systems will adopt this approach. The testing we’ve done so far is insufficient for many reasons, but we hope that the rigor of evaluations will scale up as AI systems become more capable.As we expected going in, today’s models (while impressive) weren’t capable of autonomously making and carrying out the dangerous activities we tried to assess. But models are able to succeed at several of the necessary components. Given only the ability to write and run code, models have some success at simple tasks involving browsing the internet, getting humans to do things for them, and making long-term plans – even if they cannot yet execute on this reliably.

Transcription

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet

Help us prioritize this episode for transcription by upvoting it.

0 upvotes

🗳️ Sign in to Upvote

Popular episodes get transcribed faster

Other episodes from LessWrong (Curated & Popular)

Transcribed and ready to explore now

"Ada Palmer: Inventing the Renaissance" by Martin Sustrik

28 Jan 2026

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)

"The inaugural Redwood Research podcast" by Buck, ryan_greenblatt

27 Jan 2026

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)

"Canada Lost Its Measles Elimination Status Because We Don’t Have Enough Nurses Who Speak Low German" by jenn

26 Jan 2026

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)

[Linkpost] "“The first two weeks are the hardest”: my first digital declutter" by mingyuan

20 Jan 2026

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)

"Why we are excited about confession!" by boazbarak, Gabriel Wu, Manas Joglekar

19 Jan 2026

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)

"Backyard cat fight shows Schelling points preexist language" by jchan

16 Jan 2026

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)

View all episodes from LessWrong (Curated & Popular)

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Please log in to write the first comment.

Report any issue

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)

"More information about the dangerous capability evaluations we did with GPT-4 and Claude." by Beth Barnes

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet

Other episodes from LessWrong (Curated & Popular)

"Ada Palmer: Inventing the Renaissance" by Martin Sustrik

"The inaugural Redwood Research podcast" by Buck, ryan_greenblatt

"Canada Lost Its Measles Elimination Status Because We Don’t Have Enough Nurses Who Speak Low German" by jenn

[Linkpost] "“The first two weeks are the hardest”: my first digital declutter" by mingyuan

"Why we are excited about confession!" by boazbarak, Gabriel Wu, Manas Joglekar

"Backyard cat fight shows Schelling points preexist language" by jchan

Sign in to Audioscrape

Share this moment