Menu
Sign In Search Podcasts Charts People & Topics Add Podcast API Blog Pricing
Podcast Image

SaaS Interviews with CEOs, Startups, Founders

She Hit $6m Bootstrapped for HR Tool, Will Place 200,000 Candidates This Year

28 May 2022

Transcription

Chapter 1: What is the main topic discussed in this episode?

0.031 - 22.794

200% year over year growth would mean you're doing, you know, you were doing about 170 grand a month last year, about a 2 million, two and a half million run rate last year. Yeah. That's about, well, a bit more than that. Yeah. A bit more than 200%, but yeah. You are listening to Conversations with Nathan Latka, where I sit down and interview the top SaaS founders, like Eric Wan from Zoom.

0

23.855 - 45.18

If you'd like to subscribe, go to getlatka.com. We've published thousands of these interviews, and if you want to sort through them quickly by revenue or churn, CAC, valuation, or other metrics, the easiest way to do that is to go to getlatka.com and use our filtering tool. It's like a big Excel sheet for all of these podcast interviews. Check it out right now at getlatka.com.

0

48.263 - 68.687

Hey folks, my guest today is Barb Hyman. She's been working in career executive HR roles. She realized that companies weren't able to unlock the true potential of their people simply because they didn't have bias-free insight on everyone's strengths. She's now trying to solve this via human learning and machine learning at sapia.ai. Barb, you ready to take us to the top?

0

69.548 - 86.868

I am so excited to be here. Thank you so much, Nathan. All right. Anytime anyone mentions AI machine learning, I always just cut right to it and go, what's your total team size and how many engineers? I think the big question is how many data scientists we have. Because I think there's a lot of talk about what is AI.

0

86.888 - 107.776

And one quick check that I suggest to businesses is go out on LinkedIn and see whether there are any data scientists. If there are not, then there's not really AI going on. That's right. So where are you guys? So we are headquartered in Australia. We have an amazing team, which we call Phi Labs, who are really our innovation machine. They're a group of PhDs in machine learning and AI.

107.816 - 127.828

They're full-time or consultants? No, no, no, it's all full-time. We only have full-time. We're about 54 people. We've been product-led from the beginning because you need to be when you're building technology that's used to support human decision-making. So we have engineers, machine learning engineers. Everything we do is proprietary, so we don't use any open-source technology.

127.808 - 145.632

algorithms or products we effectively are a fully vertically integrated machine learning system that has built a capability to understand you Nathan from a short conversation so it's really new science it's something that IBM tried to do with Watson for a couple of decades but couldn't because they didn't have the data

145.612 - 161.911

And even though Google has 10,000 PhDs working in NLP, they can't do it either because they don't have the data. So there are some elements that we've got that are pretty unique. And that's what's really fueled our capability and our continued innovation. I want to give you some time to defend that because most people listening are going to wait.

161.931 - 177.381

How does this lady I'm just hearing on Nathan's show have more data than Google? So defend that a little bit. How have you gotten unique data that Google doesn't have? Yeah, so there's a lot of discussion around, you know, do you actually need to have large data sets in order to create impressive and accurate predictive models?

Chapter 2: How does Barb Hyman leverage machine learning in HR?

193.865 - 209.487

In their case, it's the leadership principles. Now, you can use humans to do that, which they can afford to do because they're a well-resourced organization, but most can't. How do you actually maintain that level of rigor but remove all the human bias by using technology? That's what we're doing by chat.

0

209.467 - 229.283

The data that we have that's first party and proprietary data is the responses to those structured interviews. That's now at about 800 million words. It'll be at a billion words fairly soon. And that is our- Across how many interviews? 800 million words, how many candidates? About 1.8 million interviews. Okay, got it. Over what period of time? Across 47 countries and around about three years.

0

229.905 - 247.604

So it took us 18 months to build a product. You can't just hire engineers and suddenly have a machine learning product. You actually need to capture the data, do the research, most importantly, do the bias testing. And we started with what we call machine learning models, where you take a hired signal.

0

247.644 - 267.855

Like if you think about what Amazon did wrong all those years ago in 2018, that they took CV data and they tried to build a predictive model of that. The issues are firstly, when you're hiring off your incumbents, you risk amplifying existing biases. And secondly, when you're using CV data, you're very likely to amplify existing biases. We don't do that. The data set we're using is clean.

0

268.075 - 288.528

It is just words. It doesn't have any demographics. It's It doesn't even have the question in it. And that's what makes this a purer way to understand people and use AI in a safe way for people decision-making. Okay, Barb, I understand the product. This is great. What are companies paying on average per month or per year to use your technology? Yes.

288.548 - 308.295

So we have typically multi-year annual contracts. We're not a monthly subscription because we're enterprise focused. We work with businesses that have big pain, which normally mean that they're big. So we're not at the point where a mid-market or a small business can use us, right? It's just like $50,000, $100,000 ACVs or what would you say the average is? Yeah.

308.315 - 330.198

It's around about $100,000 to $150,000. We might have significantly higher than that, but somewhere around about $100,000 would be typical. Okay. Do you have any customers that are by themselves paying you more than a million per year? No. Can you get there quick in next year or two? Look, there are different ways to drive revenue depth. You can build more product to get there.

330.258 - 349.833

But right now for us, we have a number of really large customers that are pretty close to that. And part of why we're coming into the US, we've got... a handful of customers here, Ericsson, Air Canada, North America, obviously. We've just won a couple of others. And our ambition is to obviously take the incredible product market fit in Australia.

349.853 - 368.82

We work with most of the trusted consumer brands there, Qantas Group, Woolworths Group, Bunnings. Anyone who's on the ASX is aware of us, if not using us. We want to bring that to the US market. So our focus is to be really, really focused. And we see growth coming from expansion, continuing to deliver this value

Chapter 3: What unique data does Sapia.ai utilize that sets it apart from competitors?

557.515 - 578.357

And we have basically had 200% plus growth year on year since then. We're currently in the US. I'm here in Seattle right now. and have been in San Fran, just meeting with VCs and getting to know that market because our business has really been funded. I've put in my own money. I've put in half a million dollars because I'm a huge... Barb, is that a lot?

0

578.477 - 594.372

Are you super rich from a past accident or is that a lot of money for you? I'm just a regular person. I'm a regular person. That was all your savings, your hard-earned savings. It's a lot of money. You have to make this work. Yeah. That was the second mortgage, right? That's not money that's sitting in the bank.

0

594.352 - 619.095

And then we've had some amazing, really high net worth people in Australia that have funded my vision and really backed me and believed in me. When was that pre-seed round? So end of last year, we had some investors coming in. And so what we want is to now figure out who do we want to partner with? I really want a partner and a set of partners that can help us grow in the US.

0

619.195 - 640.845

So we're doing the rounds of VCs over here. Do you guys care about valuation right now, specifically your valuation? Do you think you might raise soon or sell a portion of the company? There is no other tool on the internet that you can use to get a better and higher valuation than FounderPath's new valuation tool.

0

640.825 - 663.565

We have over 253 deals that went down over the past 30 days, all the revenue numbers, all the valuations and the multiplier. That way you can go filter the data, find companies that are your same size, what they sold or raised for or at, and then use those as comparables in your decks to argue and debate and get. a higher valuation and less dilution, which is the name of the game, less dilution.

663.986 - 691.393

Check it out today at founderpath.com forward slash products. That's plural forward slash valuations. Again, both plural founderpath.com forward slash products forward slash valuations. How much did you raise in the pre-seed last year? I'm not a privy to disclose that. Oh, okay. You don't want to share that? No, no. But what I would say is that we're unbelievably capital efficient.

Chapter 4: How does Sapia.ai ensure bias-free hiring processes?

691.433 - 710.974

So our return... I know. That's what I'm saying. Why wouldn't you want to brag about that? It was a six-month payback, which for an enterprise business is pretty impressive. We won't have that for this year. It might be more like a 12-month. But that's just information I'd prefer to keep private. Okay. Fair enough. Let's jump into some of the team today. So you said 54 full-time.

0

710.994 - 726.334

How many engineers? We have 16 engineers based in Australia. And then we have another three PhDs and we have two ML engineers. Okay. And you mentioned you're in the States right now trying to meet VCs, find the right partner and raise. Do you have a target in mind in terms of what you're trying to raise?

0

727.006 - 742.471

Look, I'd say between 10 to 15 US, you know, we want to really, you know, we've got a team of seven salespeople. We were pre-marketing until December. So, you know, as I said, we've been incredibly focused on the product and the product is not just what the engineers do.

0

742.491 - 756.251

It's what sits underneath in terms of the NLP and the bias testing and the bias governance and model cards and all that kind of good stuff. you know, that's been a key part of building out the product as well as the IO component that goes into our assessment.

0

756.432 - 775.176

So what we want is to, you know, build a sales team here that's bigger than three, which is what it is right now and start to invest a bit in the brand marketing side. We've just rebranded, which is exciting and we need to put a bit of money behind that. So, you know, between 10 to 15. We're not in any urgency because we've got runway until the middle of next year.

775.276 - 798.224

So for me, it's about, you know, really taking the time to find the right partner and, And obviously, for me, I'm very focused on building the story about our impact here to share what we've achieved for our customers elsewhere. And 50 customers at the average ACV you shared earlier, about $110,000 per year, would put you today at about a $6 million run rate. Is that generally accurate?

798.885 - 815.098

I'd say that's about right. Yeah. Okay. And 200% year-over-year growth would mean you're doing about $170,000 a month last year, about a $2 million, $2.5 million run rate last year. Yeah, that's about, well, a bit more than that. Yeah, we're going a bit more than 200%, but yeah. Fair. Very cool. Well, this is great.

815.139 - 834.449

I mean, this is very, I mean, look, I don't know what you raised in your pre-seed round, but I'm guessing it was less than your current ARR. And anytime I see that ratio, it's a fantastic ratio and very capital efficient. So congratulations. Thank you. Yeah, it's been a hard work. Why go give up that and you go do a $10 million raise? You have a three-person, five-person board now.

834.529 - 851.648

You've got board meetings. You give up control. That's a step you definitely want to take? Look, I mean, I think I'll probably end up moving to the US, but there's a lot that we don't know about this market. There's not a lot of localization we need to do in the product, which is great because fundamentally people are people.

Chapter 5: What is the average cost for companies to use Sapia.ai's technology?

951.714 - 969.741

But, you know, for me, this is like the best job I've ever had. I've had amazing jobs, but it's so creative. You get to work with incredible people and every day I'm learning, you know, and I'm surrounded by people who are smarter than me. And like, why would I want to bring that to an end? Guys, there you heard it. You're seeing it here on YouTube, on iTunes.

0

969.801 - 988.543

If you read in the press in like a week, say, Barb sells to ISMs for $100 million all cash up front. You know where to find her. Comment below. No, Barb, this is a great story. I guess last question before we wrap up. Net dollar retention is really key when it comes to SaaS valuations, which is key for your next raise and minimizing dilution.

0

988.943 - 1011.824

It sounds like you have pretty healthy net dollar retention, right? Above 110, 120%. We've had no churn, no direct churn. We have deals with RPOs who are like agency partners and they've been kicked out and we've, you know, had to go along with them. But our renewal rate is from our direct customers is 100%. We've had customers who have been with us for three years. It's incredibly sticky.

0

1012.284 - 1029.555

What about expansion? So are they growing? The product expansion, yes. So the product expansion, well, we are the full stack of assessment, if you like, if you're thinking about recruitment. So in terms of expansion, we need to build more product in order to get more expansion. Well, you can upsell the one number of hires, right? Same product, but more hires.

0

1030.016 - 1041.34

Yeah, but different kind of hiring requirements. So if you think about when you're hiring for white collar, there are other things that matter other than just your capabilities. So your technical skills matter. And so then you're one part of a piece, right?

1041.38 - 1050.751

So right now we just want to stay focused where we are 100% of the stack when it comes to hiring for a particular customer and just more and more of those.

1051.192 - 1079.705

So we have the ability to go and expand and that's certainly happened in some, but we're focused more on revenue growth through taking the existing formula, which is where we own the entire assessment stack for a large volume player and rinse and repeat again and again. So Home Depot, Walmart, HEB, Albertsons, all those kind of players here. ESOP's just about to go live in the US. I'm sorry.

1079.806 - 1095.664

I don't want to cut you off. We're just short on time. Just to be clear, HEB, if they hire 1,000 people through your platform last year, and this year they hire 1,200, they should be paying you more. There's 200 extra hires, but you're saying they don't. You don't drive expansion that way. Oh, no, no. That definitely plays into it. Absolutely. That's what I'm asking. That's what I'm asking.

1095.724 - 1113.147

So what's the expansion revenue from more usage over the past 12 months? Is it 120, 130% on average? Yeah, it's been about 20%. It's been about 20%. Yeah. Perfect. So net dollar retention, if you have no churn, then it would be about 120%, which is really healthy. Yeah. Very cool. All right. This is great. Anything I missed you want to touch on before we wrap up?

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Please log in to write the first comment.