In this episode I discuss the recent Queensland Court of Appeal case Staley v Hill Family Holdings Pty Ltd [2025] QCA 95, which considered the question of whether the trustee can vary a trust deed to change the appointor role, or if the variation is void because it undermines the supremacy of the appointor role and destroys the substratum of the trust. This is a must-listen for any lawyer who prepares deeds of variation or trust succession documents for discretionary trusts and testamentary discretionary trusts. The cases discussed in this episode are: Jenkins v Ellett [2007] QSC 154 Lutheran Church of Australia South Australia District Incorporated V. Farmers' Co-Operative Executors and Trustees Ltd (1970) 121 Clr 628, 18 Staley v Hill Family Holdings Pty Ltd [2024] QSC 176 Staley v Hill Family Holdings Pty Ltd [2025] QCA 95 Mercanti v Mercanti [2015] WASC 297
No persons identified in this episode.
This episode hasn't been transcribed yet
Help us prioritize this episode for transcription by upvoting it.
Popular episodes get transcribed faster
Other recent transcribed episodes
Transcribed and ready to explore now
Before the Crisis: How You and Your Relatives Can Prepare for Financial Caregiving
06 Dec 2025
Motley Fool Money
OpenAI's Code Red, Sacks vs New York Times, New Poverty Line?
06 Dec 2025
All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg
OpenAI's Code Red, Sacks vs New York Times, New Poverty Line?
06 Dec 2025
All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg
Anthropic Finds AI Answers with Interviewer
05 Dec 2025
The Daily AI Show
#2423 - John Cena
05 Dec 2025
The Joe Rogan Experience
Warehouse to wellness: Bob Mauch on modern pharmaceutical distribution
05 Dec 2025
McKinsey on Healthcare