Menu
Sign In Search Podcasts Libraries Charts People & Topics Add Podcast API Blog Pricing
Podcast Image

Whateley

Does Essendon deserve AFL assistance? - The Eminently Sensible Phil Davis (03.06.26)

03 Jun 2026

Transcription

Transcript generated automatically by AI and may contain errors.

What assistance package is Essendon seeking from the AFL?

0.031 - 16.993 Gerard Whateley

And the last element in the Essendon discussion is Keltumi reported last night at AFL.com.au that the Bombers have begun discussions with the league about an assistance package at the end of the season, given their long-term occupation at the bottom of the ladder. What's your view there?

0

18.425 - 37.35 Phil Davis

My view is very simple, Gerard, is that no one should ever get in trouble for asking for something, Gerard. And if you're a young player and you want to walk into the GM's office, they come up with $2 million a year and you haven't played a game, you've got every right to ask, Gerard. I think that's about as eloquently and polite as I can put it, Gerard. Everyone's allowed to ask.

0

37.43 - 40.935 Gerard Whateley

Yep, yep. Do you have a guiding philosophy on assistance packages?

0

42.277 - 58.411 Phil Davis

No. Unless there is mitigating circumstances and it hasn't been self-inflicted and I do not see a way out for you and you're structurally important to the football environment and industry, I don't have any interest in them. Yeah.

0

59.053 - 60.295 Gerard Whateley

Is this self-inflicted?

61.372 - 72.986 Phil Davis

Yeah, they've had enough goes out. They haven't got it right. And I don't think it's been through a lack of resources, Gerard. And that's the question. I think within reason, the assistance is... Like, I look at St Kilda.

74.087 - 89.286 Phil Davis

I think they've almost got a better argument for an assistance package than... You know, you go to the draft, you pin your whole list management strategy on Max King, and he hasn't played. Like, that, to me, is like a mitigating circumstance. And they should have made other things, don't get me wrong. But the point being that, like,

90.987 - 104.696 Phil Davis

That is a pick for an anchor in your whole entire list structure. And he's always injured. And you just can't get out of that. And you can't get back to the draft to get high enough. Like, don't get me wrong. Someone's going to, you know, pretend that I said that St. Kilda needed an assistance package.

104.716 - 119.948 Phil Davis

But the point being more, this is where they've had the resourcing and there's been injuries here, but it's largely been self-inflicted. And there hasn't been like a mitigating circumstance that's caused this dramatic drop off. Like, I don't see a reason why they could be like, hey, this was out of our control.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Please log in to write the first comment.