6DCA Oral Argument - 2025/11/04 Morning Session - Nov 04, 2025

argument

6DCA Oral Argument - 2025/11/04 Morning Session

California Sixth District Court of Appeal 2h 14m 8 chapters transcribed 8 days ago official recording ↗

▲ 0

Transcript

jump: chapters · find in transcript

Transcript

Transcript generated automatically by AI and may contain errors.

What procedural steps does the court follow at the start of a morning oral‑argument session?

Francisco Carrasco 1:45

and how long are you going to take me?

Will Abramowitz 5:17

Good morning and

Unknown 5:27

please be seated. Welcome to the Sixth District Court of Appeal for oral argument today, November 4. And we do have five matters on calendar. We'll be hearing four arguments as two of the matters will be heard together. Because we have participants who are here in person and also participants who will be joining us remotely, I'll go ahead and take appearances and time estimates on a case-by-case basis, even though we will not be having a panel change today. So I will just give myself and my colleagues a moment to connect our technology here on the bench. We do have computers here where we have access to the electronic briefs and records and any documents. So we will make sure we have that connectivity.

Unknown 6:22

And it looks like we are ready to proceed. All right. So we will take up our first matter as Francisco Carrasco versus Saeed Vedad. And Mr. Carrasco is joining us here in person. Good morning, sir. We have no participation in this appeal from the Vedads. So Mr. Carrasco, we are interested in hearing what you have to say this morning. to add to the brief that you've already submitted and the records. And I want to acknowledge that you did ask us if you could speak today about issues of aiding and abetting and things, your concerns about the lower court and the trial court judges and how they handled your case. And so we've received that request and we approve of that because we know these are issues you've brought up before.

Unknown 7:20

So we do want to hear what you have to say today. You have up to 15 minutes. We have other cases on calendar, so I need to hold you to the 15 minutes. And other than that, I'll ask that you come to the microphone here. because and you can bring your notes with you if you would like to do that but because the you can bring your notes if you want to up here to the microphone if you need any papers and the microphone is the way that we record our arguments and

Francisco Carrasco 8:05

It's recorded and this

Unknown 8:14

will be available through the court's website. So we record it and then it is live streamed right now. And then afterward, if you need to listen to what you had to say again, you can do that from the court's website.

8:29

Okay.

Francisco Carrasco 8:29

Okay. Okay.

Unknown 8:38

So, Mr. Karskal, we understand that this is an unusual experience for you. I think you're not usually in court very much. And so just try to relax, and we are here to hear what you have to say today.

Francisco Carrasco 8:55

Thank you. Can you hear me?

Unknown 8:56

Yes, I think we can hear you. And if you would, just for our record, state your name, please.

Francisco Carrasco 9:01

My name is Francisco Carrasco. And go

Unknown 9:05

ahead, sir.

Francisco Carrasco 9:06

I'm a victim, not only from a predator millionaire businessman, not against him after almost 10 years, okay, but for the system on this court. I have another case that is already in process, dismissed with Judge Chung. He already, they already make a lot of damage, emotional damage to me, both cases.

Unknown 9:36

And, sir, the other case, is that the automobile?

Francisco Carrasco 9:39

It's already dismissed. I forgot because all the emotional damage they caused me, the court, because I knew he was tentative ruling. I told him. Your tentative ruling is based on crook investigation from those two corporations, my insurance, car insurance, and also my killer driver insurance. And he still upholds his, how can I say, without offending you or anyone here. It's just malicious. judicial misconduct, and he didn't care. I missed it. I was confused which day it was on, 27 of September, or it was on the 23rd. When I learned that, I missed it. And then he didn't dismiss fully. He extended all the way to January 29. And it's a confusing ruling. He already didn't miss the case. But why he opened a 29-year...

Francisco Carrasco 10:47

hearing again with a CS for a case management conference. That is one. Okay, now I want to come into this situation.

Unknown 10:56

Okay, so Mr. Carrasco, because I think in your brief, you told us a lot about the car accident case.

Francisco Carrasco 11:02

Yeah.

Unknown 11:02

And so, and now you've talked about it, I think, again just now?

Francisco Carrasco 11:06

No, I'm going to talk with this case.

Unknown 11:08

Because, yes, this case, as we understand it, is the appeal of the dismissal of your lawsuit against the Vedas for the work that you say you did on their property.