Adrian Weckler

If we give you another year and a half, you're going to come back to us in a year's time and say, no, no, no, no, no.

We're all, you know, smothered under red tape.

This is all a crock.

You know, GDP and growth

is on the floor.

We should ditch the whole thing.

Forget about it.

And we can't afford this regulation in the first place and it'll never get through.

impetus behind it was to try and make things a little bit easier but then you get into well why were they there in the first place and yeah so let's talk about that for for a second because you mentioned hr now as i recall one of the high risk categories is around not letting ai bots you know take control of the entire recruitment process so if i'm going for a job if you're going for a job

You know, there is a certain amount of AI involvement.

If you're going for a job in a big company, a big tech company, you can see it and you can feel it.

There is a certain amount of AI involvement already.

But I think what this new regulation is designed to do is not to give the AI, you know, final say and judgment over whether or not you get a job.

In other words,

you can't be algorithmed out altogether.

And that strikes, probably strikes a lot of people as a decent rule.

Oh, no, I mean, they're becoming quite common.

They're becoming quite common.

I mean, I think we can all see why a company would deploy that if the questions are sharp and if it helps with the process.

It's just where, for example, let's say the AI decides that nobody from Ballymun is going to get a job.