Adrian Weckler

And things that we're trying to create guardrails for citizens that companies can't abuse in certain situations.

That's the basic intent of all this, isn't it?

So...

There's two sides to this, isn't there?

Because on the one hand, you can see why the law firms and the companies might say, hang on, this is an awful lot to take in.

Just give us a bit more breathing space.

We're under a lot of pressure at the moment.

And then on the other hand, you're thinking, do you know what?

If we give you another year and a half, you're going to come back to us in a year's time and say, no, no, no, no, no.

We're all, you know, smothered under red tape.

This is all a crock.

You know, GDP and growth

is on the floor.

We should ditch the whole thing.

Forget about it.

And we can't afford this regulation in the first place and it'll never get through.

impetus behind it was to try and make things a little bit easier but then you get into well why were they there in the first place and yeah so let's talk about that for for a second because you mentioned hr now as i recall one of the high risk categories is around not letting ai bots you know take control of the entire recruitment process so if i'm going for a job if you're going for a job

you know, there is a certain amount of AI involvement.

If you're going for a job in a big company, a big tech company, you can see it and you can feel it.

There is a certain amount of AI involvement already.