Al Gore

And, you know, they're much better at capturing politicians than they are at capturing emissions.

And they are employing ...

They're employing their captive politicians and policymakers to help confuse the public.

Here's an example.

Tony Blair, speaking for his foundation, his foundation gets massive funding from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Azerbaijan, et cetera.

He said, oh, well, the center of the battle has to be carbon capture and direct air capture.

Well ...

He really should know better, you know?

Upton Sinclair wrote in My Country Years Ago, it's difficult to get a man to understand something if his income depends on him not understanding it.

The income goes to the foundation, as I understand it.

So, boy, look, we're going for carbon capture.

We don't have to reduce the burning of fossil fuel.

We'll capture it all as it goes out the smokestack.

It is a fraud!

It is a deception imposed on the people in order to try to change policy and to make the policy what they want.

And because they've captured the politicians, they have been able to force the taxpayers in countries around the world to subsidize fossil fuels, to actually subsidize the destruction of humanity's future.

What would happen if we got rid of those subsidies?

Well, the International Monetary Fund said that we would get $4.4 trillion in savings, which happens to be just about the exact amount we need to finance the transition to renewable energy.

That's where a lot of the money can come from.

We'd also save a lot of lives, and we'd also...