Menu
Sign In Search Podcasts Libraries Charts People & Topics Add Podcast API Blog Pricing

Al Roth

👤 Speaker
101 total appearances
Voice ID

Voice Profile Active

This person's voice can be automatically recognized across podcast episodes using AI voice matching.

Voice samples: 1
Confidence: Medium

Appearances Over Time

Podcast Appearances

Freakonomics Radio
678. Who Gets to Choose a “Good Death”?

And there's a line in there which says –

Freakonomics Radio
678. Who Gets to Choose a “Good Death”?

you know, the objection to medical aid in dying is much stronger than capital punishment or war, right?

Freakonomics Radio
678. Who Gets to Choose a “Good Death”?

Because she thinks there might be reasons for capital punishment and war, but the Catholic Church is quite clear that it thinks there's never justification for medical aid in dying.

Freakonomics Radio
678. Who Gets to Choose a “Good Death”?

Although, I mean, the Catholic Church

Freakonomics Radio
678. Who Gets to Choose a “Good Death”?

is also at the forefront of providing hospice care.

Freakonomics Radio
678. Who Gets to Choose a “Good Death”?

They don't think people necessarily have to die after months of agony.

Freakonomics Radio
678. Who Gets to Choose a “Good Death”?

They're willing to try to take care of people who are dying to ease the agony, but they don't like shortening life.

Freakonomics Radio
678. Who Gets to Choose a “Good Death”?

He did.

Freakonomics Radio
678. Who Gets to Choose a “Good Death”?

He thinks it's not justified.

Freakonomics Radio
678. Who Gets to Choose a “Good Death”?

And so opponents of medical aid in dying are no doubt now looking for a case that can be appealed to the Supreme Court.

Freakonomics Radio
678. Who Gets to Choose a “Good Death”?

And the fact that we have a Supreme Court which has two conservative members very much committed that medical aid in dying should be illegal makes me skeptical about what I would otherwise notice, which is that medical aid in dying has a lot of appeal to a society like ours where advances in medicine have not...

Freakonomics Radio
678. Who Gets to Choose a “Good Death”?

ended death by any means, but have allowed the dying process to sometimes go on for a long time in uncomfortable, undignified, painful ways.

Freakonomics Radio
678. Who Gets to Choose a “Good Death”?

It's hard to get the actual numbers, but I think there's no question that there's a lot of

Freakonomics Radio
678. Who Gets to Choose a “Good Death”?

covert medical aid in dying in places where it's not legal.

Freakonomics Radio
678. Who Gets to Choose a “Good Death”?

And the reason is that the same medicines that relieve pain can also shorten life.

Freakonomics Radio
678. Who Gets to Choose a “Good Death”?

When I talk to doctors, many of them know of cases that they think of as having been medical aid in dying.

Freakonomics Radio
678. Who Gets to Choose a “Good Death”?

And there have been some papers, there's one from Australia, that says that when you survey doctors privately, there's quite a bit of medical aid in dying.

Freakonomics Radio
678. Who Gets to Choose a “Good Death”?

So I think that the high numbers in Canada that are causing some backlash against the Canadian laws

Freakonomics Radio
678. Who Gets to Choose a “Good Death”?

Incidentally, the large majority of those are elderly, late-stage cancer patients.

Freakonomics Radio
678. Who Gets to Choose a “Good Death”?

I think that a lot of those big numbers come from the fact that there was medical aid in dying before it was legal in Canada, just because when you have bony metastases from cancer, you're in pain.