Alex Hormozi

Absolutely.

Do they make as much as they could?

Probably not.

And so this is an absolute promise to you, is that throughout all of human history, humans plus superior technology beat humans with inferior technology.

It worked from the Stone Age to the Bronze Age.

It worked from the Bronze Age to the Iron Age.

It worked from the Iron Age to the Titanium Age, right?

Or the aluminum, which I think my Aussies say.

You can see it very naturally.

And so also I wanna give this as a little bit, like a tiny bit of,

stress relaxation for you.

As long as it is humans plus tools against humans with other tools, then you are still competing against humans.

And as long as that game still goes, you should feel endlessly confident.

The day that you try to beat the machine, you will lose.

And every time we've tried to say, machines will never beat us at chess, machines will never beat us at Go, machines will never beat us at insert X, they always do.

Just like autopilot on planes, everyone is very against it.

Now, there's going to be pushback on a lot of AI stuff, but not because of its function, but because of people's emotions around it.

Now, in a world of infinite AI labor and intelligence,

where the cost of intelligence and labor go to functionally zero, rather the cost of energy, the last valuable thing that a human will get paid to do would be to take risk.

And so that is something that you incur that no one else can really take away from you, which is why I think money will exist in the future.