Alex Svanevik

And...

I think most of them are going to do some horrendous mistakes that are going to lose a lot of people money and they're going to blow up and go out of business.

And our approach is like, let's make sure that does not happen because we care about our users and we want to make sure that they can preserve and grow their portfolios.

We can't guarantee it, but we can do our very best to make sure that nothing bad happens.

So I think quality, trust are super important.

And then I think the other part is generally people know the Nonsense brand.

They know that we can be trusted for analytics, for data.

And so I think we have a little bit of brand asset that we can use there for trading as well.

We're a serious company that's here for the long run.

Hopefully I'll build this company until I die.

And who knows, maybe my daughter takes over the company or something.

But it's not like a single cycle company.

We're here for the long run.

That's how I would think about it.

Just better quality.

People can try it themselves.

We run tons of evals internally.

What I would love to do is to create benchmarks that we can run all the other agentic products against and see who's actually best.

Just like we do with Claude.

OpenAI models, Gemini, we should have benchmarks like that and then we can actually objectively measure that Nansen is indeed the best agentic trading product.