Alex

So one of the other things that's happening is people are saying –

if she can't carry kids on her own, she should adopt.

And then a lot of people are responding to that saying, no, of course there are tons of children that need to be adopted and that's a separate issue.

But just because a woman biologically can't have kids and because of science, she's now able to have kids.

That's,

Just because she doesn't... A lot of women that can't have kids were chiming in saying, just because I can't have kids doesn't mean I have to adopt.

Like, this is incredible.

If I want my DNA in a baby, I should be allowed to have that just because I was born one way.

And I agree with that.

I think they're two separate issues.

like what's the point of what's the point of being upset over that well I think that do you know what I actually think it is I think it's the headline I think the headline is daunting and people don't sit with it long enough and so they they see deceased womb making a kid like that just when I read it I read it on BBC it popped up on my page and I was like what on earth and I clicked on it then you know you ask yourself like how do you feel about a woman being able to have kids now incredible right

I think it's incredible.

I think it's a huge win and it's life changing for this girl.

And I know surrogacy can be really expensive and it can take a really long time.

And so I think it's cool.

This also takes a long time.

I don't know how expensive it is, but I think it's cool.

Just the further we get along with women who aren't biologically able to have kids to be able to have kids.

I think it's cool.

exactly i don't i don't know why we would take that away from them um so that's yeah that's what's going on over there in the uk and it wasn't that long ago that they had their first so i think in 2013 the first or 20 2007 or 2013 huh my my photographic memory is not serving me on this one but sweden i think did the first womb transplant from an alive person to an alive person