Alice Han

He would want to see China reducing its restrictions on foreign, especially American investments going into China. allowing more equal participation for U.S. investors in China, and similarly China buying more American products. So it's not a surprise that Besant said we had a great deal in phase one.

He would want to see China reducing its restrictions on foreign, especially American investments going into China. allowing more equal participation for U.S. investors in China, and similarly China buying more American products. So it's not a surprise that Besant said we had a great deal in phase one.

I think that they will go back to aspects of that, ask China to increase agro-purchases and purchases of energy products, and similarly find ways for China to reduce the subsidies on certain goods which they believe to be unfair trade practice. Elsewhere, I think that Trump really cares about fentanyl.

I think that they will go back to aspects of that, ask China to increase agro-purchases and purchases of energy products, and similarly find ways for China to reduce the subsidies on certain goods which they believe to be unfair trade practice. Elsewhere, I think that Trump really cares about fentanyl.

I think that they will go back to aspects of that, ask China to increase agro-purchases and purchases of energy products, and similarly find ways for China to reduce the subsidies on certain goods which they believe to be unfair trade practice. Elsewhere, I think that Trump really cares about fentanyl.

He will want to see some kind of cooperation on China reducing the subsidies for the precursors to fentanyl. I'm a bit more optimistic now that there could be some kind of cooperation that would enable that discussion to happen. And on the Chinese side,

He will want to see some kind of cooperation on China reducing the subsidies for the precursors to fentanyl. I'm a bit more optimistic now that there could be some kind of cooperation that would enable that discussion to happen. And on the Chinese side,

He will want to see some kind of cooperation on China reducing the subsidies for the precursors to fentanyl. I'm a bit more optimistic now that there could be some kind of cooperation that would enable that discussion to happen. And on the Chinese side,

So China subsidizes industries that produces the precursor chemicals for fentanyl, effectively creating these cheap fentanyl products that then get flooded into the American market. Now, China says it's cracked down on fentanyl itself exports to the US, but the precursor chemicals are still being produced by China.

So China subsidizes industries that produces the precursor chemicals for fentanyl, effectively creating these cheap fentanyl products that then get flooded into the American market. Now, China says it's cracked down on fentanyl itself exports to the US, but the precursor chemicals are still being produced by China.

So China subsidizes industries that produces the precursor chemicals for fentanyl, effectively creating these cheap fentanyl products that then get flooded into the American market. Now, China says it's cracked down on fentanyl itself exports to the US, but the precursor chemicals are still being produced by China.

So I could foresee more collaboration on that front for China to, again, reduce or even cut off all exports of those chemical components. And that would be seen as a win for Trump and for his political base. On China's side, all that they care about is that they want to achieve a degree of supply chain self-sufficiency, especially when it comes to the harder areas like semiconductors.

So I could foresee more collaboration on that front for China to, again, reduce or even cut off all exports of those chemical components. And that would be seen as a win for Trump and for his political base. On China's side, all that they care about is that they want to achieve a degree of supply chain self-sufficiency, especially when it comes to the harder areas like semiconductors.

So I could foresee more collaboration on that front for China to, again, reduce or even cut off all exports of those chemical components. And that would be seen as a win for Trump and for his political base. On China's side, all that they care about is that they want to achieve a degree of supply chain self-sufficiency, especially when it comes to the harder areas like semiconductors.

They want to keep growing and not have these huge trade risks that Trump poses. And they want to extract geopolitical concessions potentially in the long term over Taiwan. That is a long-term game, but I think the two first priorities are how do we grow stably and how do we maintain supply chain dominance and resilience.

They want to keep growing and not have these huge trade risks that Trump poses. And they want to extract geopolitical concessions potentially in the long term over Taiwan. That is a long-term game, but I think the two first priorities are how do we grow stably and how do we maintain supply chain dominance and resilience.

They want to keep growing and not have these huge trade risks that Trump poses. And they want to extract geopolitical concessions potentially in the long term over Taiwan. That is a long-term game, but I think the two first priorities are how do we grow stably and how do we maintain supply chain dominance and resilience.

I actually don't think it gets in the way of China's goals because I think it is in China's interest to rebalance. They've said this for over two decades now, but when push comes to shove, they've been faced with some kind of slowdown or economic crisis, be it GFC, be it COVID, be it trade war one, and they've walked back. on some of these rebalancing efforts.

I actually don't think it gets in the way of China's goals because I think it is in China's interest to rebalance. They've said this for over two decades now, but when push comes to shove, they've been faced with some kind of slowdown or economic crisis, be it GFC, be it COVID, be it trade war one, and they've walked back. on some of these rebalancing efforts.

I actually don't think it gets in the way of China's goals because I think it is in China's interest to rebalance. They've said this for over two decades now, but when push comes to shove, they've been faced with some kind of slowdown or economic crisis, be it GFC, be it COVID, be it trade war one, and they've walked back. on some of these rebalancing efforts.