Alison Triessl

So whoever did that and the the people obviously contend that it was Paul Canero, the brother, and that he had every motive, including many dollar signs to do away with the entire family.

It is one of those cases where you're shaking your head saying, well, this is true.

This is a case of greed, of despair, and a family just ripped apart.

Well, I'm not going to use the word decent, okay?

Because I'm going to be straight with our listeners, right?

I mean, there are times where I say, wait a minute, we got something here.

Let's talk about it, okay?

What their theory is,

at this point, before they have put on their case, through the defense attorney at opening, was that the police did a really shoddy job, that they rushed to judgment, that there was a third brother that also stood to make a substantial amount of money if this entire family was wiped out.

Because Keith Canero's blind trust

if something happened to his entire family would be split between Paul and the third brother, Corey.

And Corey was not involved in the business and Corey was never thoroughly investigated.

So their argument thus far seems to be blame it on the police.

The police did not thoroughly investigate this case and therefore there are potential other suspects

that were never questioned.

The police put blinders on, they immediately honed in on Paul, and therefore it is their fault that there isn't somebody else sitting here as the defendant in this case.

We have a name for it, and it is some other dude did it.

Some other dude did it.

So yes, TJ, that is not unusual.

It is not unusual.