Alison Triessl

And it's smart.

Does it work?

Well, sometimes it works.

But is it smart?

Well, what else do they have, right?

What else do they have?

They have to say it wasn't him.

And they have to say that if the police and law enforcement would have done their homework, they would have found the true culprit.

It wasn't him.

But I will tell you that it wasn't just the opening statement so far.

When I heard the phone call

From Keith to Paul, where he, and this is the day before, okay, where he says, where's the money, Paul?

What did you do with the money, Paul?

And I'm talking about the money that was supposed to be paid for the premium for this blind trust that only Paul had control over.

Right.

But there had also been a previous dipping into the funds, allegedly, for $25,000 that went to Paul's school event that was clearly not for the trust to go to his children, to go to Keith's children.

And then we hear from the accountant and the accountant's on the stand and the accountant is talking about how it was discovered, how there was some cooking of the books, according to the accountant, that the accountant said that he routinely reviews all the checks that go to make the premiums.

And it appears from what the accountant is testifying to that that Paul was very methodical in covering up making those payments when in fact those payments to the life insurance company had never hadn't been made for months and months.

Here we go.

Ready?