Andrea Dunlop

But yeah, I mean, it certainly, when we talk about this child's particular medical history and the things that she underwent up until the point where she was at Rady's, it doesn't stand out to me as something that would be particularly invasive.

But yeah, I mean, it certainly, when we talk about this child's particular medical history and the things that she underwent up until the point where she was at Rady's, it doesn't stand out to me as something that would be particularly invasive.

Yeah, that's a good point. I mean, when I look at the things that are outlined in this lawsuit, you know, EKG, renal function panel test, plasma, renin test, which is a blood test, you know, x-ray, medical behavioral treatments. I mean, those are things that would make a lot of sense if you are treating a child's

Yeah, that's a good point. I mean, when I look at the things that are outlined in this lawsuit, you know, EKG, renal function panel test, plasma, renin test, which is a blood test, you know, x-ray, medical behavioral treatments. I mean, those are things that would make a lot of sense if you are treating a child's

Yeah, that's a good point. I mean, when I look at the things that are outlined in this lawsuit, you know, EKG, renal function panel test, plasma, renin test, which is a blood test, you know, x-ray, medical behavioral treatments. I mean, those are things that would make a lot of sense if you are treating a child's

with a lot of medical complexity and a lot of medical complexity that you're not sure is what the parents have said it was. Like if you are treating a child in the context of a medical child abuse suspicion, I mean, these things make a lot of sense if you're trying to figure out what is really going on with this child and what might be a fabrication.

with a lot of medical complexity and a lot of medical complexity that you're not sure is what the parents have said it was. Like if you are treating a child in the context of a medical child abuse suspicion, I mean, these things make a lot of sense if you're trying to figure out what is really going on with this child and what might be a fabrication.

with a lot of medical complexity and a lot of medical complexity that you're not sure is what the parents have said it was. Like if you are treating a child in the context of a medical child abuse suspicion, I mean, these things make a lot of sense if you're trying to figure out what is really going on with this child and what might be a fabrication.

Scarlet letter. I mean, that certainly is. I would say that is a very emotionally evocative language. And I think it's very interesting in like because there's this tension between the rights of the parents and the safety of the child. That certainly puts.

Scarlet letter. I mean, that certainly is. I would say that is a very emotionally evocative language. And I think it's very interesting in like because there's this tension between the rights of the parents and the safety of the child. That certainly puts.

Scarlet letter. I mean, that certainly is. I would say that is a very emotionally evocative language. And I think it's very interesting in like because there's this tension between the rights of the parents and the safety of the child. That certainly puts.

like emphasis on the experience of the parents right so not this sort of thought of like yes we should always look at child abuse you know sort of like not focused on the child and what she may have experienced or what may have you know been a possibility but really looking at that experience of that parents dealing with that accusation and now certainly i want to acknowledge that like that would be horrible we recognize that it's horrible for a family to be accused of abuse

like emphasis on the experience of the parents right so not this sort of thought of like yes we should always look at child abuse you know sort of like not focused on the child and what she may have experienced or what may have you know been a possibility but really looking at that experience of that parents dealing with that accusation and now certainly i want to acknowledge that like that would be horrible we recognize that it's horrible for a family to be accused of abuse

like emphasis on the experience of the parents right so not this sort of thought of like yes we should always look at child abuse you know sort of like not focused on the child and what she may have experienced or what may have you know been a possibility but really looking at that experience of that parents dealing with that accusation and now certainly i want to acknowledge that like that would be horrible we recognize that it's horrible for a family to be accused of abuse

However, abuse is very much a part of our society and child abuse as a whole is common. Munchausen by proxy abuse is not rare. So, yeah, that's certainly striking and certainly mirrors many of the other lawsuits I've seen certainly came to play in the Kowalski case.

However, abuse is very much a part of our society and child abuse as a whole is common. Munchausen by proxy abuse is not rare. So, yeah, that's certainly striking and certainly mirrors many of the other lawsuits I've seen certainly came to play in the Kowalski case.

However, abuse is very much a part of our society and child abuse as a whole is common. Munchausen by proxy abuse is not rare. So, yeah, that's certainly striking and certainly mirrors many of the other lawsuits I've seen certainly came to play in the Kowalski case.

where, you know, in that instance, because of Beata's suicide, that the implication was that these accusations that she was a perpetrator of Munchausen by proxy abuse drove her to suicide because they were so emotionally distressing. And so I think that is, yeah, that's certainly striking, certainly striking language and it's striking language to use as a judge, right?

where, you know, in that instance, because of Beata's suicide, that the implication was that these accusations that she was a perpetrator of Munchausen by proxy abuse drove her to suicide because they were so emotionally distressing. And so I think that is, yeah, that's certainly striking, certainly striking language and it's striking language to use as a judge, right?

where, you know, in that instance, because of Beata's suicide, that the implication was that these accusations that she was a perpetrator of Munchausen by proxy abuse drove her to suicide because they were so emotionally distressing. And so I think that is, yeah, that's certainly striking, certainly striking language and it's striking language to use as a judge, right?