Andrea Dunlop

And I think we have, which I have been, thoroughly disabused of this notion at this point, but I think we have this idea that judges are these sort of neutral parties that are going to make decisions based on legal precedent and the facts in front of them, and that's just not what happens.

And I think we have, which I have been, thoroughly disabused of this notion at this point, but I think we have this idea that judges are these sort of neutral parties that are going to make decisions based on legal precedent and the facts in front of them, and that's just not what happens.

And I think we have, which I have been, thoroughly disabused of this notion at this point, but I think we have this idea that judges are these sort of neutral parties that are going to make decisions based on legal precedent and the facts in front of them, and that's just not what happens.

I think particularly in family court situations where you're not dealing with the same level of evidence that's being presented, I have seen quite a lot of op from judges in these decisions and quite a lot of extremely colorful language about the nature of that, which, of course, is, you know, a judge's prerogative, I suppose.

I think particularly in family court situations where you're not dealing with the same level of evidence that's being presented, I have seen quite a lot of op from judges in these decisions and quite a lot of extremely colorful language about the nature of that, which, of course, is, you know, a judge's prerogative, I suppose.

I think particularly in family court situations where you're not dealing with the same level of evidence that's being presented, I have seen quite a lot of op from judges in these decisions and quite a lot of extremely colorful language about the nature of that, which, of course, is, you know, a judge's prerogative, I suppose.

But but, yeah, I think it is, you know, judges are human beings that bring all their biases and feelings to their to the bench with them. And it certainly seems like this judge may have had some feelings about this case.

But but, yeah, I think it is, you know, judges are human beings that bring all their biases and feelings to their to the bench with them. And it certainly seems like this judge may have had some feelings about this case.

But but, yeah, I think it is, you know, judges are human beings that bring all their biases and feelings to their to the bench with them. And it certainly seems like this judge may have had some feelings about this case.

Off the top of my head, my sisters, Sophie Hartmans, Mary Welch, a police investigation was ongoing when the family court, because the family court is based on preponderance of evidence rather than beyond a reasonable doubt, it doesn't involve a jury. It's a much less robust process. That often comes to a decision point before the criminal court follows through. So where are we now?

Off the top of my head, my sisters, Sophie Hartmans, Mary Welch, a police investigation was ongoing when the family court, because the family court is based on preponderance of evidence rather than beyond a reasonable doubt, it doesn't involve a jury. It's a much less robust process. That often comes to a decision point before the criminal court follows through. So where are we now?

Off the top of my head, my sisters, Sophie Hartmans, Mary Welch, a police investigation was ongoing when the family court, because the family court is based on preponderance of evidence rather than beyond a reasonable doubt, it doesn't involve a jury. It's a much less robust process. That often comes to a decision point before the criminal court follows through. So where are we now?

When is this happening? The judge makes a decision that returns custody of Madison to her parents. How long has she been in Raddy's when this happens?

When is this happening? The judge makes a decision that returns custody of Madison to her parents. How long has she been in Raddy's when this happens?

When is this happening? The judge makes a decision that returns custody of Madison to her parents. How long has she been in Raddy's when this happens?

you know kind of process and present and so so at that point yeah so as you said she remains in the hospital for whatever whatever medical condition complexities is still ongoing with her um and but her parents now have custody back so there would be presumably no restrictions

you know kind of process and present and so so at that point yeah so as you said she remains in the hospital for whatever whatever medical condition complexities is still ongoing with her um and but her parents now have custody back so there would be presumably no restrictions

you know kind of process and present and so so at that point yeah so as you said she remains in the hospital for whatever whatever medical condition complexities is still ongoing with her um and but her parents now have custody back so there would be presumably no restrictions

um of course there could be i mean we've seen court orders where there are you know the sophie hartman the case is one where you know there were additional restrictions put on for like a period of time so we don't really know that to be the case but likely they were then much more involved with her and with her medical decision making than they were previous to that decision

um of course there could be i mean we've seen court orders where there are you know the sophie hartman the case is one where you know there were additional restrictions put on for like a period of time so we don't really know that to be the case but likely they were then much more involved with her and with her medical decision making than they were previous to that decision