Andrea Dunlop

um of course there could be i mean we've seen court orders where there are you know the sophie hartman the case is one where you know there were additional restrictions put on for like a period of time so we don't really know that to be the case but likely they were then much more involved with her and with her medical decision making than they were previous to that decision

Right. Because this is always one of the huge challenges of covering these cases and The reason we were able to cover them so robustly in the my quality case was because of the litigation that brought much of that into the public record that would not have otherwise been. Because again, this varies from state to state, but certainly anything involving child protection work.

Right. Because this is always one of the huge challenges of covering these cases and The reason we were able to cover them so robustly in the my quality case was because of the litigation that brought much of that into the public record that would not have otherwise been. Because again, this varies from state to state, but certainly anything involving child protection work.

Right. Because this is always one of the huge challenges of covering these cases and The reason we were able to cover them so robustly in the my quality case was because of the litigation that brought much of that into the public record that would not have otherwise been. Because again, this varies from state to state, but certainly anything involving child protection work.

family court dependency decisions, those are all sealed under ordinary circumstances, as is, of course, the medical records themselves. Any reports that the child abuse pediatrician would have made, those would all be sealed because of HIPAA and or because they're sensitive documents related to child protection.

family court dependency decisions, those are all sealed under ordinary circumstances, as is, of course, the medical records themselves. Any reports that the child abuse pediatrician would have made, those would all be sealed because of HIPAA and or because they're sensitive documents related to child protection.

family court dependency decisions, those are all sealed under ordinary circumstances, as is, of course, the medical records themselves. Any reports that the child abuse pediatrician would have made, those would all be sealed because of HIPAA and or because they're sensitive documents related to child protection.

So yeah, the tracking down of the source documents and the availability of those can be very difficult in these cases.

So yeah, the tracking down of the source documents and the availability of those can be very difficult in these cases.

So yeah, the tracking down of the source documents and the availability of those can be very difficult in these cases.

All right. Well, thank you so much, Bex, for your research on this case and for walking us through it. And we will see you next week. This episode of Nobody Should Believe Me Case Files was hosted and executive produced by me, Andrea Dunlop. Dr. Becks is my co-host and the lead researcher for the Ratty Children's case. Mariah Gossett is our supervising producer.

All right. Well, thank you so much, Bex, for your research on this case and for walking us through it. And we will see you next week. This episode of Nobody Should Believe Me Case Files was hosted and executive produced by me, Andrea Dunlop. Dr. Becks is my co-host and the lead researcher for the Ratty Children's case. Mariah Gossett is our supervising producer.

All right. Well, thank you so much, Bex, for your research on this case and for walking us through it. And we will see you next week. This episode of Nobody Should Believe Me Case Files was hosted and executive produced by me, Andrea Dunlop. Dr. Becks is my co-host and the lead researcher for the Ratty Children's case. Mariah Gossett is our supervising producer.

Greta Stromquist is our producer and editor. Aaron Ajayi is our fact checker. And thanks also to Nola Karmouche for administrative support.

Greta Stromquist is our producer and editor. Aaron Ajayi is our fact checker. And thanks also to Nola Karmouche for administrative support.

Greta Stromquist is our producer and editor. Aaron Ajayi is our fact checker. And thanks also to Nola Karmouche for administrative support.

True Story Media. Hello, it's Andrea. Today, we have the first part in our new series about the lawsuit in San Diego involving Ratty Children's. This is a frequently requested topic for Case Files, and I'm incredibly thankful to Dr. Becks, who is taking on the lion's share of the research and reporting on this one.

True Story Media. Hello, it's Andrea. Today, we have the first part in our new series about the lawsuit in San Diego involving Ratty Children's. This is a frequently requested topic for Case Files, and I'm incredibly thankful to Dr. Becks, who is taking on the lion's share of the research and reporting on this one.

True Story Media. Hello, it's Andrea. Today, we have the first part in our new series about the lawsuit in San Diego involving Ratty Children's. This is a frequently requested topic for Case Files, and I'm incredibly thankful to Dr. Becks, who is taking on the lion's share of the research and reporting on this one.

Those of you who've been with us for a while may remember that I started off my coverage of a similar lawsuit in Florida, Kowalski v. Johns Hopkins All Children's, intending to make it a four-part miniseries. Dozens of episodes, and I don't even want to know how many hours later, here we are. So, four-part miniseries has really become the three-hour tour of this show.