Andrea Dunlop

And I just remember when we were talking about this concept. And I actually had a back injury when I was in college. um, there was a sports injury, right. And I saw PT for it. And, and like, it's obviously like having back pain is very, you know, and then I had another one where I like fell off a rock climbing wall and crushed the facets in my back.

And I just remember when we were talking about this concept. And I actually had a back injury when I was in college. um, there was a sports injury, right. And I saw PT for it. And, and like, it's obviously like having back pain is very, you know, and then I had another one where I like fell off a rock climbing wall and crushed the facets in my back.

And like, you know, for both of those, again, that was actually really painful, but like for both of those things, I just ended up doing PT and that was very effective for me. But I know that sort of, there's been, you know, in the last 20 years, like a lot of shifting conversations about without having surgery on your back for pain because it's so high risk.

And like, you know, for both of those, again, that was actually really painful, but like for both of those things, I just ended up doing PT and that was very effective for me. But I know that sort of, there's been, you know, in the last 20 years, like a lot of shifting conversations about without having surgery on your back for pain because it's so high risk.

And like, you know, for both of those, again, that was actually really painful, but like for both of those things, I just ended up doing PT and that was very effective for me. But I know that sort of, there's been, you know, in the last 20 years, like a lot of shifting conversations about without having surgery on your back for pain because it's so high risk.

You know, you could be having a lot of pain and there wouldn't necessarily be anything on an MRI. And it's just very, very complex. So I won't get out of my lane here, but this makes sense, I think, in a context.

You know, you could be having a lot of pain and there wouldn't necessarily be anything on an MRI. And it's just very, very complex. So I won't get out of my lane here, but this makes sense, I think, in a context.

You know, you could be having a lot of pain and there wouldn't necessarily be anything on an MRI. And it's just very, very complex. So I won't get out of my lane here, but this makes sense, I think, in a context.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Yeah.

So in terms of how Dr. Bolognese shows up in this case, in the lawsuit, he is very much presented as a respected neurosurgeon who first evaluates Madison in 2019. So she had this diagnosis previously of Ehlers-Danlos, but Dr. Paolo Bolognese is called out as confirming this diagnosis of EDS and then adding the additional diagnoses of POTS And fibromyalgia, which is a chronic pain disorder.

So in terms of how Dr. Bolognese shows up in this case, in the lawsuit, he is very much presented as a respected neurosurgeon who first evaluates Madison in 2019. So she had this diagnosis previously of Ehlers-Danlos, but Dr. Paolo Bolognese is called out as confirming this diagnosis of EDS and then adding the additional diagnoses of POTS And fibromyalgia, which is a chronic pain disorder.

So in terms of how Dr. Bolognese shows up in this case, in the lawsuit, he is very much presented as a respected neurosurgeon who first evaluates Madison in 2019. So she had this diagnosis previously of Ehlers-Danlos, but Dr. Paolo Bolognese is called out as confirming this diagnosis of EDS and then adding the additional diagnoses of POTS And fibromyalgia, which is a chronic pain disorder.

So it also says that he ruled out any signs of medical child abuse. So this is something that comes up a lot in these cases. And I will say there are several other doctors that are named as sort of ruling out or not seeing signs.

So it also says that he ruled out any signs of medical child abuse. So this is something that comes up a lot in these cases. And I will say there are several other doctors that are named as sort of ruling out or not seeing signs.

So it also says that he ruled out any signs of medical child abuse. So this is something that comes up a lot in these cases. And I will say there are several other doctors that are named as sort of ruling out or not seeing signs.

Right. And the individual doctors were saying, one individual doctor, especially when a child is seeing many doctors, one individual doctor not seeing signs of medical child abuse is not in any way exculpatory. It is one piece of a thousand piece puzzle. So just because you have some doctors that

Right. And the individual doctors were saying, one individual doctor, especially when a child is seeing many doctors, one individual doctor not seeing signs of medical child abuse is not in any way exculpatory. It is one piece of a thousand piece puzzle. So just because you have some doctors that

Right. And the individual doctors were saying, one individual doctor, especially when a child is seeing many doctors, one individual doctor not seeing signs of medical child abuse is not in any way exculpatory. It is one piece of a thousand piece puzzle. So just because you have some doctors that