Andrea Miotti

And I think most people say an overwhelming no to having superintelligence

replace them across the board.

And I think governments still have time to act and say, a lot of AI development is fine.

It can be great for economic competitiveness.

It can be great even for military uses.

But we should say a hard no to superintelligence.

Prohibiting the development of superintelligence, no AI that can escape human control, it can endanger national and global security.

And I think if we make that choice, we're going to stay in control.

We will face a lot of disruption, but we're going to face a good future with AI.

Yeah, absolutely.

So I think this is why it's important that these rules are targeted and really surgical.

It's not about regulating the entirety of AI development.

That would be quite complicated.

I think it can be done.

A lot of things are regulated, and some of them are, frankly, over-regulated, and they're much more mundane than AI.

All drugs that we consume are regulated.

A lot of food is regulated.

Cars are regulated.

I could go on and on.

So it's totally possible.