Andrew Weissmann

You mentioned the law firms.

Well, that was the whole idea, which was that you sort of deter your enemies from being able to get counsel. Then you bring these kinds of actions with respect to them so that they find it that much harder. I do think that there's still...

Well, that was the whole idea, which was that you sort of deter your enemies from being able to get counsel. Then you bring these kinds of actions with respect to them so that they find it that much harder. I do think that there's still...

Well, that was the whole idea, which was that you sort of deter your enemies from being able to get counsel. Then you bring these kinds of actions with respect to them so that they find it that much harder. I do think that there's still...

although it's not as many as you would hope, but I still think there are lots and lots of lawyers who are reputable and believe in the profession of law and the fact that you have to zealously advocate for people. Here's just another irony. You would think that a president who has been through four criminal cases would understand the importance and need for defense counsel.

although it's not as many as you would hope, but I still think there are lots and lots of lawyers who are reputable and believe in the profession of law and the fact that you have to zealously advocate for people. Here's just another irony. You would think that a president who has been through four criminal cases would understand the importance and need for defense counsel.

although it's not as many as you would hope, but I still think there are lots and lots of lawyers who are reputable and believe in the profession of law and the fact that you have to zealously advocate for people. Here's just another irony. You would think that a president who has been through four criminal cases would understand the importance and need for defense counsel.

He enjoyed criminal defense counsel in all of his cases. He enjoyed civil counsel in all of his cases. And this is an effort to basically say, you should not enjoy the rights I had in defending myself.

He enjoyed criminal defense counsel in all of his cases. He enjoyed civil counsel in all of his cases. And this is an effort to basically say, you should not enjoy the rights I had in defending myself.

He enjoyed criminal defense counsel in all of his cases. He enjoyed civil counsel in all of his cases. And this is an effort to basically say, you should not enjoy the rights I had in defending myself.

Well, the other thing that's sort of interesting is I don't really understand if the law firms are now going to be doing administrative work, they're going to be conflicted out of cases where they're also suing and be willing to sue the administration. So I think that is one of the ways in which this is going to be insidious.

Well, the other thing that's sort of interesting is I don't really understand if the law firms are now going to be doing administrative work, they're going to be conflicted out of cases where they're also suing and be willing to sue the administration. So I think that is one of the ways in which this is going to be insidious.

Well, the other thing that's sort of interesting is I don't really understand if the law firms are now going to be doing administrative work, they're going to be conflicted out of cases where they're also suing and be willing to sue the administration. So I think that is one of the ways in which this is going to be insidious.

It's not just that we're going to get administration pro bono work, but it makes it very hard to do the kind of work that they've been doing, many NGOs partner all the time with large law firms in bringing cases. And these, by the way, they're private entities. They're entitled to be as political as they want to be.

It's not just that we're going to get administration pro bono work, but it makes it very hard to do the kind of work that they've been doing, many NGOs partner all the time with large law firms in bringing cases. And these, by the way, they're private entities. They're entitled to be as political as they want to be.

It's not just that we're going to get administration pro bono work, but it makes it very hard to do the kind of work that they've been doing, many NGOs partner all the time with large law firms in bringing cases. And these, by the way, they're private entities. They're entitled to be as political as they want to be.

They can be taking all Republican causes, all Democratic causes, whatever it is, they're private entities. So the idea that the administration is saying, oh, you're not being even-handed, who the hell are you to say that to a law firm? They And so it's really insidious in so many ways.

They can be taking all Republican causes, all Democratic causes, whatever it is, they're private entities. So the idea that the administration is saying, oh, you're not being even-handed, who the hell are you to say that to a law firm? They And so it's really insidious in so many ways.

They can be taking all Republican causes, all Democratic causes, whatever it is, they're private entities. So the idea that the administration is saying, oh, you're not being even-handed, who the hell are you to say that to a law firm? They And so it's really insidious in so many ways.

As the judges who have struck down every single executive order on the law firms that's been challenged has been immediately, within one day, struck down as violative of at least the First Amendment, if not also the Fifth and Sixth Amendment. It's a lot of different parts of the Constitution. Yeah.